MODIFIED BEDINI SALE ON EBAY

[WilbyInebriated]

  OOK OOK!!  ME SWING THIS TREE LONG TIME!!  ME BIGTIME CHIMP TELL OTHER CHIMPS WHAT TO THINK!! OOOOOOK!!

LMFAO!!  you described him to a T!

[Omnibus]

Ahh.  I see it took you over 15 minutes to come up with your opinion on why he should not post that for sale, but only a further 14 minutes to degenerate into insulting me!  Troll it is for you then!

As to my knowledge of very tiny things, some of which we can observe, and some of which we can't... you have no knowledge of my level of research therein, nor am I going into a battle of wits with someone half-armed.  I know what I know, and you do not, and that is the difference between us, on many levels.

In closing, I really do not care what you think, as your opinion has exactly 0 effect upon me.  Feel free to swing your dick around some more in an opportunity to try to be the alpha male you never could quite be by acting like an asshole on an internet forum.  OOK OOK!!  ME SWING THIS TREE LONG TIME!!  ME BIGTIME CHIMP TELL OTHER CHIMPS WHAT TO THINK!! OOOOOOK!!

This is another load of crap and you'd do better not to clutter the forum with that kind of stuff. Defending a scammer in this way is insulting to everybody here, not just me.

[twinbeard]

This is another load of crap

While I thank you for pre-qualifying your posts, we are now all well aware that they are indeed, loads of crap.

and you'd do better not to clutter the forum with that kind of stuff.

Once again, you are operating under the mistaken presumption that I want your opinion. 

Defending a scammer in this way is insulting to everybody here, not just me.

Look, its not like this guy is my best friend.  We exchanged a few posts as he read the same thread I read, and we built devices along the same lines.  In fact, he challenged some of my early results, and well enough so that I have significantly improved my measurement techniques as a result.  That required investment on my part... in both my time learning how to lower margin for error in measurement, and my money for the specialized tools required to mitigate the factors which could cause inaccurate readings.  So you could say that this guy has really cost me, and why the hell would I defend him for that?  Because his questioning of my results led me to a greater understanding of the work undertaken.  To me, that is a positive contribution to a forum of this nature, and not the actions of a scammer.  Yeah, the guy is crotchety... so what.

Further, I understand his device.  I have a more advanced version.  He is on the right track.  Or rather, one of many right tracks.  Sure, its on a prototype board instead of a finished circuit board that he could have designed and had printed for a few dollars.  Sure, there are clip leads all over the place instead of proper terminations.  Its not the most beautiful build in the world, and I doubt he will actually sell it.  Maybe he is even a little confused... they used lead solder in the old days, you know.  Its obviously not a "finished product" type of item... but let me ask you this:  Do you eat at McDonalds?  I don't.  I find it odious.  Foul.  Not even to be considered food.  I once took a Greyhound from Florida to California.  Every meal stop from Nebraska to the Cali border was McDonalds, with nothing else in sight but gas station fodder.  Needless to say, I was rather hungry when I finally got to Cali.  Even under such conditions where I was forced to be there, I did not find it necessary to stand outside the McDonalds and tell every passer by what I thought of the establishment.  Nobody is forcing you to read this thread.  Get it?

[Omnibus]

It was not only by chance that my first post in this thread was asking whether or not it's self-sustaining. I asked that even before looking at the vids because I don't want to waste one more second to assess bogus claims. I only looked further when others commented on it and especially @TinselKoala. He's a snide guy, many know that and he's had his share of scam but also he knows some things and sometimes you can exchange a quality thought with him here and there. It is clear to those who are in the know in this business of OU that a device can be pronounced as an OU device without providing high quality experimental measurements only if that device is self-sustaining. Even worse, mainstream won't even listen if you try to talk about OU even if there are undeniable experimental data but the device isn't self-sustaining. This here is not mainstream and folks would listen but it better be well supported with evidence. This forum and others too have seen so much crap that adding more to it is unnecessary. What this felow is doing is crap and supporting such crap is making you an accomplice. If you disagree let's see what experimental results you have. Otherwise, don't bother. No one is interested to know what opinion you're interested in or not.

[twinbeard]

NOTE TO ALL.  Unless this guy comes up with some better reparte than this, I am done with him after this.  Trollbaiting during the holidays can be fun, but I do have better things to do.  I'm sure you will understand, and appreciate this lesson on how to deal with a bully.

It was not only by chance that my first post in this thread was asking whether or not it's self-sustaining.  I asked that even before looking at the vids because I don't want to waste one more second to assess bogus claims.

Had you watched the vids, it would be obvious to you that he is making no such self runner or loopback claim.  As to time wasted... you are accumulating that in abundance it appears.  You should cut your losses now and leave an old man who wants too much for a lamp alone.

I only looked further when others commented on it and especially @TinselKoala. He's a snide guy, many know that and he's had his share of scam but also he knows some things and sometimes you can exchange a quality thought with him here and there.

I will keep that in mind.  A quality thought is a rare thing indeed this day in age.
I keep waiting to hear one from you.

It is clear to those who are in the know in this business of OU that a device can be pronounced as an OU device without providing high quality experimental measurements only if that device is self-sustaining.

That is a reasonable metric.  It must be noted, however, that not all devices with a COP > 1 are designed to loop back and run themselves.  In some cases, this may even be a bad choice in design consideration.

Even worse, mainstream won't even listen if you try to talk about OU even if there are undeniable experimental data but the device isn't self-sustaining. This here is not mainstream and folks would listen but it better be well supported with evidence. This forum and others too have seen so much crap that adding more to it is unnecessary. What this felow is doing is crap and supporting such crap is making you an accomplice.

Ok, so if you truly are an appointed forum Nazi, then ban me!  If he is making crap, let the marketplace sort it out.  I have no stake in his selling or not selling anything, so if you want to take civil action against me, go ahead.  My lawyer loves dipping into peoples pockets for filing frivilous suits... I could use 15-20 thousand of your cash.  If you are a government employee and want to arrange some criminal charges, I think you will find that you will meet frustration there as well, and will likely be looking for new employment in the near future.   Otherwise, opinions are like assholes, buddy.

If you disagree let's see what experimental results you have. Otherwise, don't bother. No one is interested to know what opinion you're interested in or not.

Well, since you are the big forum tough guy, I will allow you to go first, since you insist on a duel.   Perhaps you could show me something that you have built that is not "crap."  I will then counter with my own, non-"crap" device.  Further, given your tough guy status, what with the ability to speak for how many thousand members of this forum, you should be able to find my experimental results on your own, that is, "if ya'll can google real good."