Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Strategy Ruminations

Started by Omnibus, December 28, 2010, 09:35:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

The effect I'm reporting has been first found experimentally. It is not true that it's only been simulated on a computer.

someother

Hey, for those of you spamming the thread - go in the top of it and read carefully, you can read, right?

Ok, I completely messed up the things. I don't know where my head was when I made the excel's formulas.

No I have corrected what you told me. The input power is

U*I (voltage probe at the + of the power source; current probe at the - of the power source).

The output power is

I^2*R

I got 1000 results, from the 1010 row, to 2009; This is 1,25 uS, I think.

Ok, now... I've tried to calculate the energies, instead of the power. So I calculated the energy for every value of U and I multiplied by the time (for the input). And I^2*R multiplied by the time for the output.

The results for the power ratio are opposite to the energies ratio.

teslaalset

Quote from: someother on March 11, 2011, 03:16:41 AM
No I have corrected what you told me. The input power is

U*I (voltage probe at the + of the power source; current probe at the - of the power source).

The output power is

I^2*R

I got 1000 results, from the 1010 row, to 2009; This is 1,25 uS, I think.

Ok, now... I've tried to calculate the energies, instead of the power. So I calculated the energy for every value of U and I multiplied by the time (for the input). And I^2*R multiplied by the time for the output.

The results for the power ratio are opposite to the energies ratio.

@Someother,
Can you repost the excel file? It seems corrupt in previous post unfortunately.

someother

@teslaalset,

http://www.2shared.com/document/3TKchPUr/sim2-new.html

Please comment it, because I am still unsure for the calculations.

teslaalset

Quote from: someother on March 11, 2011, 08:29:45 AM
@teslaalset,

http://www.2shared.com/document/3TKchPUr/sim2-new.html

Please comment it, because I am still unsure for the calculations.

In my view you made a possible typo in Cell F2 and H2

Your formula's:
F2: =AVERAGE(E1010:E2009)
H2: =AVERAGE(G1010:G2009)

In my view this should be:
F2: =AVERAGE(E2:E2009)
H2: =AVERAGE(G2:G2009)

The energy ratio can be simply calculated as =SUM(G2:G2009)/SUM(E2:E2009), since the time parameter is eleminated by the ratio formula, since:

Ein=Pin*t
Eout=Pout*t
Ratio = Eout/Ein= (Pout*t) / (Pin*t) , where t is equalized