Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Joule Ringer!

Started by lasersaber, December 29, 2010, 02:19:43 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Lynxsteam

Somewhere a couple pages back I posted specs on the E-Core I have been using.  I used 16 turns primary, 160 turns secondary - telephone wire 24 awg.  I used the single 2N3055 transistor.  Primary wound solid across spool and one wound with two primaries, one unused.  Primary wound first.  Diodes anywhere in the circuit are not so good.  Resistors anywhere just burn amps.  Caps have little effect.  # of turns on either primary/secondary don't matter for oscillation.  HV can be connected or not.

I would love to hear how you got 71 L/W.

Tank circuit.  Think about that.  Why is it called a tank?  Do we want a teacup or a swimming pool?

 

JouleSeeker

Quote from: Lynxsteam on May 31, 2012, 10:31:36 AM
Somewhere a couple pages back I posted specs on the E-Core I have been using.  I used 16 turns primary, 160 turns secondary - telephone wire 24 awg.  I used the single 2N3055 transistor.  Primary wound solid across spool and one wound with two primaries, one unused.  Primary wound first.  Diodes anywhere in the circuit are not so good.  Resistors anywhere just burn amps.  Caps have little effect.  # of turns on either primary/secondary don't matter for oscillation.  HV can be connected or not.

I would love to hear how you got 71 L/W.

Tank circuit.  Think about that.  Why is it called a tank?  Do we want a teacup or a swimming pool?

Thanks for showing interest --  going from 64 Lm/W with the air core PLUS two 20cm Ferrite cores laid into it, 71 Lm/W was achieved by simply moving down the taps, from primary winding 37 (64 Lm/W) to 31 (71Lm/W).  Going further, the efficacy dropped off -- at winding 25, 61 Lm/W.

OK -- I have some wire and I have the e-core recommended by Lasersaber.  I will use heavier wire for the 16 turns, lighter wire for the secondary, NO caps or resistors -- see if I can get it to fly.

Tank circuit?  makes me think of an LC circuit.  Without caps, the only C is in the turns... could still be a tank circuit I think -- Is this what you are saying?

JouleSeeker

So today I wound the Lasersaber -recommended E-core, and fired her up!  worked great, after a little fiddling. 
Thanks for input -- especially Lasersaber, Lidmotor and Lynxsteam.  (The three L's?  ;)  )

Video shows the result:  http://youtu.be/XGZf0_T_e14

If you see the voice out-of-sync with the picture, let me know, would you?  I'm seeing that problem.

Here's the description with it:
Quote
I did a replication of Lasersaber's 2.0 super-Joule-ringer, described here:
http://laserhacker.com/SuperJouleRinger2.html
First runs at 10V from the power supply, at about 0.08A.  I measured the Lux output from a 1.5W LED bulb, shown in the vid, in my calibrated light-box:   440 Lux, so 35 Lumens.
The input power is 10V * 0.08A = 0.8W (from the power supply readings). 
So we have for Lasersaber's 2.0 operating at 10V input, 35Lm/0.8W =  about 44 Lm/W.

This is less than I had with Lynxsteam's air-core system shown in background in the vid. BUT, in next vid at 17 Volts, the E-core system gets up to 74 Lm/W, which is better than I ever got with the air-core system (even adding Ferrite rods into the air-core system).

Since this is my first winding of the Lasersaber E-core, I'm quite sure even higher Lm/W yields can be achieved. 

I highly recommend use of the straightforward light-box (described at energeticforum.com and overunity.com) to get quantitative Lumens/Watt readings -- much more reliable than the naked eye!


NickZ

   Thanks Steven, looking good. Lets keep at it, you might beat all expectations.
   The super Joule Ringer  2.0 video is currently unavailable for viewing. 
Any one know what's going on, or it is just me?

JouleSeeker

  OK, I've done a vid on a few more tests:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MlYzx8_wKFs&feature=youtu.be

Nothing spectacular, but lots of fun.
From my description of the vid:

QuoteMore experiments on my replication of Lasersaber's super-Joule-ringer 2.0 (described at Laserhacker.com).   Here I add one 82 pF cap across the LED lamp (a test recommended by Lynxsteam-- thanks!).  I also show the effect of varying the voltage on the current draw and on the light output.  At 17V input, the system reaches about 70-72 Lumens/Watt.  One hand on the voltage control, the other holding the video camera... Happy experimenting!