Bob Beck Protocol for curing AIDS and Cancer

[CompuTutor]

Thanks Big-M,
I've never known an OU DL link to fail,
perhaps that PC had Win-RAR archive issues...

I DL'd that link of yours
and did a binary comparison to be sure
to my known-good copy and it is identical.

I've grown leary of linking off-site though.

So people take your choice,
here and there are verified identical
(But OU made me split it sadly...)

[the_big_m_in_ok]

...and did a binary comparison to be sure
to my known-good copy and it is identical.

I looked carefully at the manuscript and it does say between pgs. 18-30, or thereabouts, there are two kinds of electrical disease "zappers" that can be built which should work as Clark describes the process.

I may try this, since I am pre-diabetic right now.

REEDIT:
It occurs to me that according to Clark's manuscript mentioned above, high voltage as seen in a Lakhovsky radiating coil isn't necessary.  Low, positive pulsating voltage at the correct frequency is enough.
Way less EMI, I think?  High voltage with arcing radiates strongly in EMI.  Clark's invention doesn't do that.

--Lee

[papazaf]

there are similarities with the rifle machine, but rifle , i think is working in the ultrasound range( making the ionizes gas in the tube to vibrate and transmit ultrasound)
Is there a way to know witch of these are more effective?
i want to build one , and i am between the zapper and the rifle machine.
any suggestions?

[the_big_m_in_ok]

there are similarities with the rifle machine, but rifle , i think is working in the ultrasound range( making the ionizes gas in the tube to vibrate and transmit ultrasound)
Is there a way to know witch of these are more effective?
i want to build one , and i am between the zapper and the rifle machine.
any suggestions?

I had the thought of taking a 120VAC--12.6VAC Radio Shack transformer, adding a current limiting light bulb to one side of the output, a diode to the other side (so that positive voltage is experienced by the one touching it); such that positive DC is being felt by the experimenter the same way pulsating DC is felt by someone using the hand-applied "zapper" at 2-5 HZ for 7 minutes.

This way doesn't tire out the hand and doesn't kill expensive batteries.

--Lee

[MrMag]

I looked carefully at the manuscript and it does say between pgs. 18-30, or thereabouts, there are two kinds of electrical disease "zappers" that can be built which should work as Clark describes the process.

I may try this, since I am pre-diabetic right now.

REEDIT:
It occurs to me that according to Clark's manuscript mentioned above, high voltage as seen in a Lakhovsky radiating coil isn't necessary.  Low, positive pulsating voltage at the correct frequency is enough.
Way less EMI, I think?  High voltage with arcing radiates strongly in EMI.  Clark's invention doesn't do that.

--Lee

Rife, Clark, and Becks units are designed to attack the disease/parasite/bacteria and Lakhovsky's device is designed to rejuvenate your cells so that they can fight off the disease. Also, although Lakhovsky's device is more then capable of producing arcs and sparks, the machine is tuned to lower levels when treating patients. The thing I like about Lakhovsky's device is that it rejuvenates all of the cells in your body so that you will get a more complete "treatment" instead of just focusing on one item.

papazaf,

If you knew the exact frequencies that Rife used and the exact equipment, I would think that his device would be more beneficial. But I think there are too many unknowns about what exactly he did and how he did it. The equipment out there that is available to purchase that are claiming to be Rife units, are only using his name to sell devices. Rife did not use these in his treatments. His equipment was much more sophisticated. If you look at what he had and how he used it compared to what is being sold, you can see that they are different devices.