About OverUnity.com Section

[FreeEnergy]

I think you should have a section where people can know what FREE ENERGY/Over Unity is, and what it can do for us and how we can go about this stuff. Most people have NO clue to what Over Unity/Free Energy is or what it can do for us and that it is very POSSIBLE! At least I believe so.

[FreeEnergy]

or 'What is Over Unity / Free Energy?' section.

some suggestive guides:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Over_unity

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamic_free_energy

Also see... The Free energy suppression:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_energy_suppression

[FreeEnergy]

wow thanks for adding this section! 

*cheers* 

[Clarky]

Over-unity devices

Over-unity (OU) is the process by which output energy exceeds input power required to produce it. OU advocates distinguish this from "perpetual motion" (and avoid a violation of the law of conservation of energy) by saying that the extra energy is extracted from some infinite, invisible reservoir, such as the "zero-point energy field". However, to date there is no credible theory or experiment showing that such a reservoir exists.

The theory of cold fusion is also controversial, but subject to more serious scientific research, with several allegedly successful tests. However, none of the experiments were reproducible.

Why do people not research properly before posting information like this on wiki?

There have been over 600 claimed successful replications of cold fusion up till late 2005.

http://www.padrak.com/ine/NEN_5_3_7.html

Fowler's committee was, apparently, the infamous Energy Research Advisory Board committee that set out to look at cold fusion. When they were shown excess thermal energy they reported "bad calorimetry". When they were shown evidence of some neutrons, they decided "bad instrumentation". When they were shown tritium they said "contamination". Apparently Fowler, by his own admission, has not sought to learn any more about cold fusion since 1989. Fowler is completely unprepared to be considered as currently competent in regard to cold fusion developments.

Michael Shermer is equally unprepared to evaluate cold fusion. In our files we have over 3,000 papers about cold fusion with over 600 papers reporting on successful replication. Shermer apparently reads only those scientific journals that refuse to publish anything about cold fusion.

Also what about the documentary 'it runs on water' . I'm dissapointed at some people who post on wiki, It's just not good enough really, the information is too conservative or just not updated enough.

[FreeEnergy]

hey also at the home page of this website it should say:

Welcome to OverUnity.com

The International open source free energy research forum.

or


The International free energy open source research forum.


or it doesn't really matter as long as open Source is being part of it.


peace