Is there proof gravity can not be a energy source?

[brian334]

I will give it a day or two to see if anybody can prove gravity can not be a energy source. Free speech is a good thing- gold shines and shi t stinks.

[Omnibus]

You may keep it as long as you wish but the truth won't change. All the free speech in the world, obeying reason and scientific argument, will tell you that the very essence of force, as it is defined, is not energy and therefore needs no proof it's different.

[mscoffman]

@all,

This has to do with the physics of metric fields. A gravitational metric field is
how the universe computes how much gravitation potential energy an object
has and it has the responsibility to covert gravitational potential energy into
(dynamic) energy. These are two different things. The universe uses quaternion
math calculations for doing this. The question is for any complex situation
is; “Can the quaterians be computationally overloaded?” causing the real root
solution of the equation to not match up with the COE conservation-of-energy
solution. If so the universe might “select wrong” when asked to compute complex
situations and it may even be possible to have all solutions to the quaterians be
in violation with COE. This should be study-able mathematically. This overloading
would be expected to occur during cross product operation between two different
classes of metric fields like magnetic and gravitational.

I expect that COE was accepted using only simple classes of experiments as models
and that perhaps more complex situations (like double acting pendulums) should
have been studied. Also there are not many classes of metric fields to study and
they may not have had magnetic systems with sufficiently high magnetic energy
for doing valid experiments using cross field experiments. Behavior of magnets
was apparently used as suggestion for some of Newton questions about gravity.
So I don’t think this is an irrelevant subject and may still be an open question.

“I think this points out the we should study the universe in askance through
scientific experiments rather then having humans attempt to dictate the
creator’s design decisions.”

One could see a potential energy to dynamical energy converter screwing up
because the potential energy metric field is the only way the universe knows
how much p. energy is left. There would be no cross checks to stop energy
errors from continuing to occur if one did.

:S:MrkSCoffman

[brian334]

Some people post things here that do not make any sense.

[Omnibus]

I have already shown in several instances that violation of CoE is inherent in the standard theoretical physics but has been missed. No need for quaternions and other complex constructs. This has nothing to do, however, with the question at hand which is well understood and needs no further discussion.