Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Shorting coil gives back more power

Started by romerouk, February 18, 2011, 09:51:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 35 Guests are viewing this topic.

i_ron

Quote from: popolibero on March 08, 2011, 03:33:11 PM
Guys, when I chop the hall signal with the 555 circuit to get more shortings per sine peak the output decreases. I mean, from what I see one big bang per peak gives more output than many shorts per peak, this I see from what I collect in the output cap. Of course I've tried sweeping the frequency and duty cycle of the 555, even to match the ringing frequency of the coil, still no luck.
Anyone else getting the same?

Mario

Mario,

What I noticed, with a small load resistor across the collection cap, was  50 volts DC single pulse, 35 volts for three pulses and then back up to 52 volts when five pulsed.

However I have no resonance ringing so need to try a small cap across the coil

Ron

gyulasun

Hi Groundloop,

Here is another one, besides what i_ron already showed you:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10398.msg276699#msg276699

Gyula

Quote from: Groundloop on March 09, 2011, 01:55:48 PM
Konehead,

>>Also this summer Gyula gave me excellent bidirectional mosfet circuit, where mosfets >>connect at the source and gate so they switch AC this works very great.

Can you post this circuit here?

GL.

popolibero

Ron, thanks. You do have resonant ringing though, if you zoom in on the spike you'll see the natural ringing of the coil dictated by its inductance and self-capacitance.

regards,
Mario

bolt

Quote from: i_ron on March 09, 2011, 02:48:06 PM
Hi Doug, and All,

The simplest "peak finder" that I could find was this one...

http://www.8051projects.info/blogs.asp?view=plink&id=198

Just use an extra coil as you were doing and with one transistor... voila... zero crossing. With the coil adjustable one just moves the coil until it sits squarely on top of the sine peak.

Here is what the circuit looks like, the diode D2 separates the voltage regulator from the transistor sense part of the circuit...

Q1 puts out a positive logic signal so a 555 won't work, I used a CD4047 for the one shot. The one shot then triggers the CD4093. R5 is a pot to set the pulse width.

But minimal parts!

Second pic is my RV setup

Third pic is what the signal looks like, but not shorting the coil in this shot

Ron

Quite a nice circuit i like the way it charges off the second coil. Only thing i am not keen is the very fact a second coil is required. With direct zero point sensing this coil is redundant as can sense just the same coil that will be shorted and also my 555 setup will work with solid state devices. You may have seen yet another version in EVgray where Kone has a circuit that uses another hall trigger to get pulses off the magnets without using a coil then you can do all the timings from that instead.

BTW in case other builders are reading make sure you use independent power supplies batteries etc for these trigger circuits and coil shorting fets. The voltage levels are all over the place in respect to each other so don't try and common everything together they need to stay floating.

bolt

Quote from: guruji on March 09, 2011, 03:47:48 PM
Hi Bolt can you please post a diagram of this?
Thanks

I am really bad with drawings i don't have any fancy 3D drawing packages. You draw it as you think i describe it and i tell you if its correct or not and if you need to change anything.