Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Shorting coil gives back more power

Started by romerouk, February 18, 2011, 09:51:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

MasterPlaster

I am beggining to think that TPU worked on the same principal.
I remeber a comment "squeezing the electrons like a hose pipe"!

giantkiller

The hose pipe is the core.

I was always looking to twisting the electrons in the core. Not so any more.

Stan states Resonant action produces the secondary form of activity called Particle-impact. This is the energy from the vacuum. This is the free energy. This is the action at a distance. This is the phase conjugation.

Quote from: MasterPlaster on March 17, 2011, 03:26:06 PM
I am beggining to think that TPU worked on the same principal.
I remeber a comment "squeezing the electrons like a hose pipe"!

yssuraxu_697

Did basic test:

Common core, coils side by side with slight gap.
Shorting one coil does not change the inductance
of the other coil.

Common core, bifilar coil, shorting one strand lowers
the inductance of other.

giantkiller

In your statement 'side by side' is that end to end? Just for clarification.
Side by side sounds like Leedskalnin PMH with U shaped core.

Quote from: yssuraxu_697 on March 17, 2011, 04:55:29 PM
Did basic test:

Common core, coils side by side with slight gap.
Shorting one coil does not change the inductance
of the other coil.

Common core, bifilar coil, shorting one strand lowers
the inductance of other.

http://www.flixxy.com/zero-pollution-automobile.htm

yssuraxu_697

Quote from: giantkiller on March 17, 2011, 06:27:16 PM
In your statement 'side by side' is that end to end?

End to end, yep.

Did one more test. This Magnacoaster thing - biasing core with magets. Test core (steel bolt) was set up like this:

NS[ ||||| ||||| ]NS
Two windings, "end to end".
Not sure was it NS NS or SN SN, did not have compass at hand.

When I fed one winding with sine wave, then other winding registered distortion like this:
http://www.qscaudio.com/support/education/designing_line_arrays/images/sine_wave_distortion.png
Look red wave.

When I fed one winding with positive square impulses, the other winding received signal strength X.
When with negative square impulses, the other winding received signal strength X - 40%.

So it has prominent "magnetic diode" effect.

In all cases received signal was weaker when magnets were attached to core.