Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Shorting coil gives back more power

Started by romerouk, February 18, 2011, 09:51:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

giantkiller

I use both types of wire. Magnet wire gives great field with low current.
I use 26awg stranded silver coated copper with teflon coating for driver coils.

Feynman

I_ron, your results very much reminds me of NAudin 2Sgen / Groundloop Solid-State Orbo.

In both cases, the strong impulse occurs on the REMOVAL of the electromagnetic (electronically energized) field -- in the presence of a magnet -- which has partially saturated the toroid/core/whatever.   There's a lot in common here.

Naudin 2SGen Solid State Generator
http://jnaudin.free.fr/2SGen/indexen.htm

@GK

Thanks for the input.  I'm going to stick with solid-core wires instead of stranded (because i don't want any 'bumps' in the field), but I will definitely use magnet wire for my tests.

Feynman

Also, can someone please explain to me which diodes are backwards (if any) in the Magnacoaster patent...

Magnacoaster Patent
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/PatD38.pdf

Thanks,
Feynman

Magluvin

Magnacoasters diode config does seem a bit odd

I see the input diodes look as to conduct source to coil ok. But why the single diodes and bridge when the input is dc?

On the right, the bridge seems to be not correct. And if diodes 102 and 104 are correct in polarity, for what ever reason, then just rotate the bridge counter clockwise 1/4 turn and the coil will conduct to the output batt
The output bridge is looking to be accepting dc in and ac out as is.

It seems as though you could eliminate the bridges all together.

The way the output is configured, and the bridge rotated correctly, only 2 of the diodes in the bridge seem to be in use at any time.

Unless the original circuit is using the diodes breakdown voltages as a spark gap of sorts.  ;]   It is very strange, the way they have most of the diodes. Why on the input and why on the output.

Mags

giantkiller

My first thought was:
Work the bridges in reverse and the batteries get charge pumped.

But then did he have to show a working model to get the patent? I seem to recall a conversation where he did not. Therefore he could print anything or a reasonable facsimile of a working unit.