Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Shorting coil gives back more power

Started by romerouk, February 18, 2011, 09:51:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

gyulasun

Hi Joe,

It is possible the mechanical setup as a whole you happen to use has got the inherent 'property' of not letting the control pulses be shorter... maybe you wish to use a small reed switch instead of the Hall to control the 4421 as a last test in this respect.  Of course this is up to you, likewise if you really wish to build another setup and not wanting to explore further behaviors of the present one like changing series capacitors, several reed switches in series like Romero mentioned for getting narrower shorting time etc.
Unfortunately I cannot answer your questions on the number of  magnets, or the type of magnets, sorry.

Keep up the good work.

Gyula



Quote from: joefr on March 27, 2011, 01:21:57 PM
Hi Gyula

I tested today the coil shorting with circuit which is using only hall sensor and mosfet ( without TC4421 driver ).
I got the exactly same result, the coil is shorted too long.
So I am thinking that this wheel setup is not good for testing coil shorting, because trigger magnets are positioned on inside part of the wheel.
I put smaller trigger magnets as showed in the video, but because they spin slower the result is almost the same that before I used generator magnets to trigger.

So i will build the new wheel, something in this way at the bottom photo:

I ask this two questions in previous post and I ask for suggestion if anyone has more experience with this:
I will be using 8 coils but I need proposal what will be better to use 7 magnet, 8 magnets or 9 magnets?

And what diameter size of bottom magnets would be fine for good power generation with coil shorting (charging caps with spikes and then dump to battery ):
1. http://www.supermagnete.de/eng/S-20-10-N
2. http://www.supermagnete.de/eng/S-30-10-N
3. http://www.supermagnete.de/eng/S-35-05-N
4. http://www.supermagnete.de/eng/S-60-05-N

Joe

Magluvin

Quote from: joefr on March 27, 2011, 01:21:57 PM
Hi Gyula

I tested today the coil shorting with circuit which is using only hall sensor and mosfet ( without TC4421 driver ).
I got the exactly same result, the coil is shorted too long.
So I am thinking that this wheel setup is not good for testing coil shorting, because trigger magnets are positioned on inside part of the wheel.
I put smaller trigger magnets as showed in the video, but because they spin slower the result is almost the same that before I used generator magnets to trigger.

So i will build the new wheel, something in this way at the bottom photo:

I ask this two questions in previous post and I ask for suggestion if anyone has more experience with this:
I will be using 8 coils but I need proposal what will be better to use 7 magnet, 8 magnets or 9 magnets?

And what diameter size of bottom magnets would be fine for good power generation with coil shorting (charging caps with spikes and then dump to battery ):
1. http://www.supermagnete.de/eng/S-20-10-N
2. http://www.supermagnete.de/eng/S-30-10-N
3. http://www.supermagnete.de/eng/S-35-05-N
4. http://www.supermagnete.de/eng/S-60-05-N

Joe


Maybe optical sensors would be more exacting.  I have found that magnets, even from the same batch can be a bit different from one another. Ive been able to adjust my reeds away from the rotor just enough that just one of the 16 magnets activate the reed. The same may go for hall sensors. But optical will be as exact as the positions set for the sensor to read.  Most printers have optical wheels that it is hard to even see the gaps in the wheel. So timing on/off can be made absolutely predictable.  =]

Mags

Thaelin

   If you want to go with optical trigger, I know a place that has N type optical transistors and they will work very well with either laser pointer or hi output  leds. I just got 30 of them for $.95 each. You can order on line as well.   Try at Surplus Gizmo's. They have say a couple a thousand of them.

thay

Tito L. Oracion

off course shorting coil gives more back power because of the input and the effect of the input, and it gives back more power depends on material and the design you make, they will all contribute for addition.  :)

just crossing   :)  ;)

joefr

Hi Mags
Maybe optical sensors would be more exacting
This is great idea thanks.

Hi Thay
Can you please post a link to this N type optical transistors.

Joe