Shorting coil gives back more power

[neptune]

.

[nul-points]

.

i know you like 'minimal', Mr neptune, but could you give us just a tad more to go on than this?

ta ever so 

[EDIT: dayyum - i SHOULD have said "i don't see the point in this post" - but actually that's ALL i can see!]

[forest]

!= closed circuit
== crash or electrons
minimal 
...

[neptune]

@nul-points .You say you could not see the point ! The point is , I was basically "Bumping" the thread to keep it in the public eye . IMO There is a Gem hidden in the first 4 pages of this thread which I think people have missed .

[nul-points]

@nul-points .You say you could not see the point ! The point is , I was basically "Bumping" the thread to keep it in the public eye . IMO There is a Gem hidden in the first 4 pages of this thread which I think people have missed .

LOL - "Bumping", eh?   

soon you'll be doing some "Grinding" on your rotor

...i'm not sure that Stefan's going to be happy about someone "Bumping & Grinding" in his forum!! 


jokes aside, i looked through the thread (from the start this time), as you suggested

i agree that Romero had learnt a lot about this process through experimentation - and he was obviously quite 'fired up' about it

you can see an evolution of some ideas which re-surfaced in his Muller Dynamo rep:

- he used the exact same drive coil circuit (apart from having a split coil)
- he went on to add a vertical coil (on the same bobbon even?)

he fed back the o/p to the battery and found that he was able to charge the 6V battery up to 7V, at which time he would have to give it some discharge so that it didn't overcharge

he tried running from capacitor (no value given), but could only achieve a few minutes before the Hall effect circuit was affected by decrease in voltage

he made a very interesting statement, that when running from battery it was important NOT to short the Gen coils while the Drive coil was switched On - only try & charge the battery during the Off period

iirc he collected the o/p from the Gen coils into a 'holding' cap & then transferred the energy to the battery at a lower rate (& during Drive coil Off, presumably)

so - why the switch during March/April from this config to the Muller config?

he was very happy with the performance of this test - he copied some aspects to the Muller rig - and 'apparently' left out other aspects

maybe the switching required for the shorting of the Gen coils, and the slower dumping of collected o/p back to the source were just too much hassle

the Muller rep seems a much 'leaner' design

and of course - there is the secret ingredient depending on your outlook

it's either a hidden battery - or else it's something which conventional engineers would overlook!

anyway, more meat on these bones here, i think!

well 'Bumped' !   
np


http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com