Something New, LaFonte Research Group

[neptune]

@Bruce . You are one of the few members posting origional ideas . If you are releasing further info , please do it in this public forum so we can all take a look . Never mind the Nay-sayers , we really value your ideas .

[Butch LaFonte]

@Bruce . You are one of the few members posting origional ideas . If you are releasing further info , please do it in this public forum so we can all take a look . Never mind the Nay-sayers , we really value your ideas .

I will post all test video's and animations here and to Youtube. The way I see it is, the more negative comments I get the more I feel that I'm on to something. I have always wondered if maybe some of these people are working for the "powers that be".
Thanks,
Butch

[Butch LaFonte]

I'm having a hard time visualizing this. Could you perhaps sketch it or add more views please.

Broli,
The stacks of square iron washers are made up of 4 washers each. When the magnet assembly moves to the right,
the upper magnets assembly opens the 4 square washers with the "fanning effect". This makes the stack below it a stack of 5 washers. The magnet on the bottom, that is one stack further ahead expands the washers under it making the stack above have 5 washers. As the first upper magnet now moves along the assembly it expands the next stack and makes the stack of 3 a stack of 5. This repeats as all the magnet assemblies move in unison down the row of square washer stacks.
Notice that when the magnet is above the stack of only 3 seperated washers it will be attracted to the solid stack of 5 washers and if tests prove successful they will pull them self down the row or at least move with no cogging.
Work can be extracted from the expansion of the stack washers.
Will post second view very shortly.
Butch
Note > The first magnet on the upper left has already expanded it's stack of four washers leaving only 3 under it.

[mscoffman]

Butch,

I believe there are several things that you could try by making small
modifications to your existing experimental setup to see if you've
produced mechanical overunity.

The other thing is you might want to try; ie. some simple ways of testing
to see if you have accidentally produced an electrodynamic gain device.

To my engineering eye the magnetic the endcaps surrounding the central
magnet looks like a near optimal solution for modulating magnetic flux.

(There are three ways that electronic gain is inferior to mechanical gain;
a) there could be internal magnetic equational linkages that conspire to
suppress overunity. b) a mechanical machine is more fundamental to
what is desired/needs to be accomplished. c) production costs will
automatically be higher.)

:S:MarkSCoffman

[Butch LaFonte]

See attached