Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[vonwolf]

  Hi Rose post #964 is a post by Poynt for me?
  Pete

poynt99
TPU-Elite
Hero Member

Posts: 1489
It's not as complicated as it may seem...

Re: Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011
« Reply #964 on: April 29, 2011, 11:49:54 AM »QuoteNow that the "as-built" circuit connections have been firmly re-established (reference diagram depicted in Simplification01_schema01.png), would anyone like to try and predict what changes might occur in the circuit operation if Q1 is completely removed from the circuit, and no capacitor or diode connected in its place?

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

  Hi Rose post #964 is a post by Poynt for me?
  Pete

Ok.  That means they've now deleted that entire post.  I'll give you the photos of this when I get that computer up.  Just to assure you all that we are NOT deluded.  LOL.  Meanwhile just read the explanation of why that schematic is WRONG. 



Take care Pete,
Kindest regards,
Rosie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I have never been afraid to stick my neck out and risk making myself look foolish and this occasion is no exception . I may be missing something , but this is my take . If we compare the picture of the underside of the board with the diagram protoboard_scema_added etc , we notice one thing . In both cases all current entering or leaving the battery has to flow through the shunt [CSR]. The only possible exception would be if any current could flow through the function generator .  So what did I miss?

Hi Neptune.  You're BANG ON.  That's exactly right.  And if you recall - Poynty's simulations show about 14 Watts COMING FROM the functions generator.  Which is absolute nonsense.  ALSO.  It is now impossible to argue this because we are DISSIPATING IN EXCESS OF 100 WATTS.  Where then did all that energy come from?

LOL.

Take care and thank you.
Rosie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Pete - if you're still there.  Does this post now read 1032 on your computer?

Rosie

[poynt99]

Hi Pete, Rose.

I've previously pointed out that there is a discrepancy in # of replies when comparing the total as you are logged on, and as you are logged off.

I have no idea why the difference, but that is the difference. Ask Stefan to check into it.

I would not worry too much about it.

.99