Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Next major problem for North American experimenters is the IRFPG50, there is no stock at Mouser, Digikey, Newark. Mouser has 400 on order... be here in August. The 2SK1365 is an equivalent, same deal, no stock. One can backorder, expected delivery 30 to 71 weeks!

This might slow me down a bit. Can we drop down to say 600 volt FETs?

Ron

And Ron,  I'll see what I can sort out by way of a source.  I'll email you as well.  But I actually don't think it'll matter one little bit if you were to drop the votages.  And nor am I sure that we need to use the IRFPG50.  Perhaps we should explore other ways and means.  In any event - let me first get my design to Groundloop.  He'll know what to do and then you guys will be able to sort of what's required.

This is the one aspect of replication that always worries me.  The point is only that we need to encourage that negative voltage.  And this little circuit is simply a first.  There are many other ways.  But let me rally here.  I'll see what I can do.

Take care there Ron,
Kindest regards,
Rosie

[neptune]

@eisnad Karm . Whilst I am a big believer in Rossi`s technology , I can not see how it makes Rosemary`s circuit redundant . Initially at least , the E-cat will be used to feed the grid I suspect . Rose`s circuit is much cheaper , and will lend itself to people living off-grid by choice or necessity
    IRFPG50 Mosfets can be bought on Ebay from Hong Kong .

[poynt99]

Next major problem for North American experimenters is the IRFPG50, there is no stock at Mouser, Digikey, Newark. Mouser has 400 on order... be here in August. The 2SK1365 is an equivalent, same deal, no stock. One can backorder, expected delivery 30 to 71 weeks!

This might slow me down a bit. Can we drop down to say 600 volt FETs?

Ron

Ron,

Please drop a few part numbers here that you wish to try, and I'll see how the results look in the simulation. Of course I can only try them if there is a model for them in PSpice. One favorite in these circles is the IRF840, but even they are difficult to get these days. Let me know.

I've never seen V_DS go above 250V, so I think 600V varieties should be fine.

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys - I need to share something with you all - at the risk of boring you all to tears.  I have, once before, actively assisted in bringing a replication to full on view and proof here on these forums.  What happened was I was persuaded that all parties involved were, indeed, active in their promotion of any new and challenging scientific truths.  What I did, deliberately, was allow them to take over the commentry - and I did this, thinking that they would then use their skills to promote this.

To my horror - what actually happened, and that with relative ease, was at the conclusion of that 'replication' I was attacked as if I were some kind of harbinger from hell.  There was a brutal attempt made to separate me from this work.  Not a bad thing, in and of itself.  Indeed, I'd welcome it.  But this was then coupled with a DENIAL of any benefits in this technology and the systematic removal of the results from public view.  You will remember - perhaps - how Ashtweth advised all and sundry - in terms that were utterly degrading - if somewhat inarticulate - that I was NOT TO BE TRUSTED.  And this was followed by Fuzzy's absurdly colourful links and rather immoderate statements - painted loud and in colour - also followed by terse commentary that was certainly as inarticulate as Ashtweth's.  Both showed a certain need for a more liberal use of a spell check and a basic schooling in simple grammer.  But the truth is that any thinking person would be well able to discern those excesses.  And certainly their arguments were based on entirely unsubstantiated allegation. 

BUT IT WORKED.  NOTWITHSTANDING.  That's the point.  Threads were no sooner opened than they were locked. Fuzzy rifled my photobucket - found out which institution was opening their labs to a review of these results - and then wrote to the parties concerned to advise them that I was stealing his technology and that I had no rights to refer to any paper at all.  Can you, for a minute, just picture the damage this did?  Fortunately those people who were approached - did their own review of the facts and those communications were dismissed - in their entirety.  But that delayed things as our own project was replaced with others during that interval where they considered things.  And I was left for the most part of that year without the supervision that would otherwise have been relegated.  Then.  As if that wasn't enough Laurel and Harvey systematically approached and still do approach - each and every member who shows/showed interest in this technology - on their private messaging system to advise them that I was/am a liar and that this technology was/is a hoax. 

Eventually the only voice I still had was on Poynty's forum.  But there were no threads unlocked - for my easy access - to discuss any developments at all.  I was now on campus - full time -and had much to share.  But my hints were ignored.  And now I was now hounded by MileHigh, Pickle and anyone who chose to to say exactly what they wanted.  There was no attempt to moderate and when I appealed to Poynty to do something was told that I should just 'cope'.  Eventually I deregistered and - then - they went through that fiasco of abusing their knowledge of my internet address to lock me out of view of their threads while they discussed me at leisure.  I then wrote Poynty to advise him that this was certainly immoral if not illegal and that I would take action.  Whereupon he wrote me the most scathing of some many scathing emails that I've been in receipt of - to advise me that I am 'a fool' and that I am 'not a scientist'. 

Now.  This is and was really the point where there was a serious breach in our relationship.  But I am only interested in the technology.  I really don't care what part I play in this.  And until these last interventions - I sincerely supposed that Poynt was looking to find the 'truth'.  We all know he's talented.  We also know that he's very interested.  And he certainly, at it's least, also acknowledged those results on his simulator.  So.  There was hope.  BUT.  With these interventions into my computer - with these ridiculous attempts to separate me from my posts - with these endless references to entirely irrelvant schematics - with a fence straddling that should be doing him some serious physical damage - with this dialogue that presumes the RIGHT to question everything and SAY nothing - with the tolerance of some seriously questionable posts on his forum - with the laughable denial of my own answers - THEN WHAT?  It would be reckless IN THE EXTREME to allow him license to take over this thread.  And that's what I'm needing.  I DO NOT HAVE THE TIME TO SPEND HERE.  I don't have the skills that you guys are looking for.  I need someone and - right now I don't know where to turn. 

If I felt for one minute that there could be someone who could take over here then I could fade out.  I have NEVER wanted 'fame' - certainly I don't want any more notoriety.  It's no fun seeing the kind of extreme venom that results from all this polarised opinion.  And more to the point.  I'm just not that well.  I don't have the energy levels needed to protect this technology.  And again.  What I'm seriously frightened for is that this fragile 'early' knowledge is then appropriated by anyone at all who then tries to 'make it their own' - as was attempted in that earlier replication. 

So.  My earnest request to you all is this.  PLEASE.  Ignore Poynt's posts.  They are made in the sincere effort to flaunt a disrespect for me that they can then appropriate the technology AS REQUIRED.  Just bear in mind that I do no-one any harm.  I have unfolded some knowledge that has been hidden from convention because of certain 'mind sets' related to energy transfer.  And my abilities at logic are really good.  Nor does one need training for this.  Just common sense.  I am deserving of considerably more respect than either he or Pickle allow and considerably more than the poisonous slurs that they indulge in on their forum.  But this appeal to discount his endless commentaries is not made on this basis.  It's made on the basis that I sincerely doubt that he intends progressing anything at all.  I suspect he has a mandate.  And I'm sure he will champion that in favour of any genuine admission.  And I see an entirely immoral and opportunistic use of whatever he needs to - to reach that object.  And then - as happened before - he'll position himself to deny everything. I don't think this technology will survive another such attack.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

ADDED

[i_ron]

Ron,

Please drop a few part numbers here that you wish to try, and I'll see how the results look in the simulation. Of course I can only try them if there is a model for them in PSpice. One favorite in these circles is the IRF840, but even they are difficult to get these days. Let me know.

I've never seen V_DS go above 250V, so I think 600V varieties should be fine.

.99

Thanks for the offer, I will see what is around, probably just a matter of trying a few different ones...

Ron