Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Well guys - it seems that Romerouk's device is now getting all the attention it deserves.  That is so nice.  And PRECISELY because it's a self runner it'll be impossible to explain this away as a measurements error.  Not that they're not trying this.  I must hand it to MH that he's engrossed in a tangled monologue about RMS values.  Never one to  entirely abandon the classical approach.  He's committing a minor heresy at OUR by claiming that one cannot determine power measurements through averaging.  Poynty will no doubt rap him over the knuckles and poynt him to his own interminable efforts here - at misdirection and obfuscation.  He needs the world and it's wife to IGNORE RMS and just concentrate on AVERAGE.  But the idiocy of all this is now so overwhelming that I think we can safely assume that from here on in - Poynty will NOT be demanding average values anywhere, ever again.  They could still claim that it's fraud.  But I think that will be laughed out of court in no time at all. 

Also of relative comfort is that there is NO further mention of our own fraudulent or deluded claim - take your pick.  Which means that Romero is now centre stage.  And unlike me - he has them FLUMMOXED.  Very nice indeed.

What rather raises the smile is that one of their members is concerned that notwithstanding the excess of expertise and professionalism and even academic accreditation available on their side, or specifically OUR side - that none of them were able to manage the required magic ingredients.  lol.  This I think is the real poser there.  It rather disinclines them to offer the required tribute.  Hopefully there's a way of controlling some of that competitive 'testosterone' and allowing good manners to 'shine through'.  Chivalry is not exactly their thing.  I recall a rather extended exercise in 'old lady bashing' which speaks to this lack.  But it would be really nice to see that they can raise the bar to the extent that they can also admit Romero's remarkable intuition.  That's surely a big factor in his impeccable experimental skills. 

Anyway - this has been a delicious diversion.  It's not off topic guys.  I'll get to the relevance in due course.  And meanwhile - I'm rooting for Romero.  Just so strongly.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

[fuzzytomcat]

So .... is this the Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011 thread it appears to be pages of way off topic subjects.

There has been a major claim in these many pages of a COP > INFINITY on a device or devices to the open source community.

There is from what I see in this thread five (5) or more circuit diagrams shown .... many of them have major problems in the IRFPG50  N Mosfet connections and CRS location which is already well known in the entire open source community.

Exactly which device is verified having the required information as being the correct circuit diagram including complete information on all parts used for a replication to reproduce the COP > INFINITY. This would include all Oscilloscope and Function Generator ( DC offset ) settings also .... everything nothing left out, and all in one place or posting.

So far I have not seen a complete package of information on a COP > INFINITY experimental device that anyone could effectively reproduce results.

A claim of COP > INFINITY takes the experimental bar to the highest position known, and requires the best accurate information available to electronics engineers and academics in order to back up that claim.

Fuzzy

[iflewmyown]

Rosemary. Thanks for all your patience in presenting this free energy device. I would guess most people that replicate it will not shout it from the roof tops. The New York Times refused to send a reporter to the Wright brothers to see a heavier than air airplane for a full five years after the first flight because they were assured by the most learned men in the field that such a thing was impossible. At that point it was the Wright brothers who were the most learned men in the field. Somethings never change.      Good luck in the future.
Garry

[fuzzytomcat]

There seem to be some confusion so here is some manufactures information on the inner portion of the IRFPG50 N MOSFET and the operation of the substrate .....

Figure 6, 7 and 8 Images from the attached (PDF) International Rectifier - Application Note AN-1005 - Power MOSFET Avalanche Design Guidelines


Fuzzy

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary. Thanks for all your patience in presenting this free energy device. I would guess most people that replicate it will not shout it from the roof tops. The New York Times refused to send a reporter to the Wright brothers to see a heavier than air airplane for a full five years after the first flight because they were assured by the most learned men in the field that such a thing was impossible. At that point it was the Wright brothers who were the most learned men in the field. Somethings never change.      Good luck in the future.
Garry

Hi iflewmyown.  I'm not so sure that it'll be that difficult to advance the news of all this COP infinitiy.  We have, ourselves, been making systematic headway - albeit rather slow.  And I'm learning how it is that more and more really discerning members of our public are actually dipping into our forums to find out for themselves what all the 'buzz' is about.  What they're not doing 'yet' is to acknowledge their preferred reading matter.  Not yet anyway. 

But motors speak to you guys - on a really deep level.  And I'm reasonably sure that there will be replications happening all over the place  What's held us up are questions related to mesurement.  No-one in their right mind will question a self runner.  It's as elegant and eloquent as is needed. 

Kindest regards and thanks for the well wishes
Rosemary