Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[neptune]

@Omnibus .You are falling into the old trap of thinking that just because an effect cant be simulated that it does not exist . In the words of the Amazing Randi ,absence of evidence is not evidence of absence . If we had to choose between you and Rosemary on this thread , I know where my vote would go . If you disagree with Rosemary , why not just leave her alone .

[MrMag]

@Omni,

We know. Everyone who disagrees with you is incompetent. Have you ever thought that maybe it's just you.

@Burger

Why have you been following for 10 years if you don't think there is anything to it. You should find something better to do with your time.

[Feynman]

@rosemary

I've read the postings on your blog with great interest.  Could you please provide higher-resolution versions of your scope shots?

That is, higher resolution versions of the images found in this article:
http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/03/report.html

I am interested in replication.

All the best,
Feynman

[infringer]

Mr. Mag excellent point "why follow something for 10years if you believe there is nothing to it ?"

Let us answer that question with some reasonable answers:

Confined to a wheel chair with limited movement. While life may suck indeed why do you not check out what Stephen Hawking has been able to do or watch the Documentary "Murderball" for inspiration in something you can really focus your efforts on instead of wasting your time on something you do not believe in.

Use forums as stress relief from the brutal mind bashing of daily life activities and work.  AKA Troll Why not use appropriate website like start your own blog or annoyances.org or something on that note why come here?

Educated and wish to share what I was taught to help make the world smarter. Why not start a website and give out free information in the form of lessons like justin guitar does and accept donations to help pay for your schooling.

Cause in the back of my mind lurking I truly believe it may provide a possible solution though I don't say that for fear of carrying a common label such as "crackpot". Why worry about a superficial thing like a label if anything that would be a push to prove the many wrong.

Because I am not really interested in the so called impossible overunity but instead am interested in real working alternative energy progress, even so why would I read overunity claims .


Any point that one could make would be moot in my eyes you have to have some childish belief in this type of thing to follow it for so many years or a belief in the possibility of this to follow it for 10 years you must be at least a hopeful of some sort.

[WilbyInebriated]

No, there's no clear cut evidence you've shown anything unusual. One way to demonstrate it is to show a PSpice simulation proving it. @poyn99 tells me he has seen no OU in your schematic in a PSpice sim but I'm still open minded. Also, try not to foist on the public here Wikipedia definitions. Show a paper from a peer-reviewed physics or chemistry journal where COP is used at all.

pspice is not proof of anything... for the love of zeus omni, you blather about science all the time yet have no idea what constitutes a proof. one person simulating a circuit is NOT proof