Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Groundloop]

Rosemary,

Is it possible to test your circuit on smaller (capacity) batteries?
So that your test run will be a few hours or so.

GL.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary,

Is it possible to test your circuit on smaller (capacity) batteries?
So that your test run will be a few hours or so.

GL.

Hi Groundloop.  The short answer is that I don't know.  The whole thesis requires an intimate relationship between the mass of the circuit and the mass of the supply.  What I do know is that we've had similar results with a single battery - so.  It's more than possible.  But our own circuit does NOT oscillate with a single battery supply.  Which also means that this mass ratio may have to be factored in.  We can certainly get some significant results with just two batteries - but there again - we don't get that high dissipation which, in my opinion - is what needs to be tested to the duration.  But frankly - I"m not interested in this side of things.  We included our battery draw down rate in a previous submission - the one published in Quantum.  There we ran two tests concurrently with a control dissipating the same level as our test.  The control was dead - at 10 volts per battery - when the experimental batteries had not even dropped by a quarter volt.  We included those results and Professor Jandrell - the reviewer - categorically refused to allow any reference to battery draw down rates.  Apparently it establishes NOTHING conclusively.  And my interests are ONLY to get this to the academic forum - somehow.  And they ONLY want classical measurement protocols.  Quite apart from which any evaluation of the battery performance actually DOES need chemistry experts.  We're none of us qualified to comment - not on our team.

But it should not be required.  Think back.  Everyone looked at the evidence of battery performance on Bedini's tests and then they wanted MEASUREMENTS.  Now that they've got MEASUREMENTS they want battery performance.  It should be MORE than enough to point to the fact that our batteries have now lasted 9 months without a recharge.  And they're ALL at the kick off voltages.  What more evidence is there required? 

In any event - I'll do those tests gladly.  But provided ONLY that it EITHER is considered conclusive by all EXPERTS - or that someone pays me to do them.  I'm not picking up another tab unless there's some value.  These last three years have cost an awful lot of money.  And I've dedicated my time here with none of the benefits  that I normally get in trading.  And it's been a thankless task.  A baptism by fire.  And the only plus is that it's attracted the attention of some academics that we could, at least, get it to a technical college for progress.  The rest of the experience has been decidedly futile.  I realise now that there's way more ego here than anything else.  I just wish I had not learned so much about so many.  I preferred it when I thought these forums were crammed by genuine enthusiasts.  I now feel that they're just a bunch of old lady bashers - and that they selectively choose their evidence on the basis of the masculinity or otherwise of the members.  Which makes me somewhat underqualified.  Not a happy time Goundloop.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[happyfunball]

your comment makes no logical sense. heat pumps are often cop>3-5... do they self sustain or self run? does their failure to do so make them invalid and nonviable?

Heat pump analogy is absurd. No moving parts with rosemary's device, purely electrical/ heat. she should simply loop it.

[poynt99]

Rose,

I fully acknowledge and understand what the simulations are indicating. The real problem however, is that you clearly don't.

.99

[happyfunball]

WHAT A JOKE.  Can you read?  If so then KINDLY READ MY REPLY AND ANSWER IN THE CONTEXT OF THAT REPLY.  Unless you wish to donate the cost of running that test.  Then - by all means.  I'll oblige. 

R

Added
And what's more we will GUARANTEE A SUCCESSFUL OUTCOME.  So?  How deep are your pockets HAPPYFUNBALL?  I'm more than game to do this PROVIDED I do not carry that expense of monitoring.

Changed 'poked' to pockets.  Poked was probably more apt.

Lol you already have the batteries and the circuit/ function generator. Why would it cost you a dime