Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[MrMag]

Wilby - thanks for trying to stem this rot.  But it really isn't needed.  Just let them rabbit on.  It does no harm and hopefully it'll take the attention off this thread until we're ready to publish.  And if we never do publish - then so what?  It just means that we'll inevitably be looking at an escalating energy crisis that will put paid to our social comforts.  And then perhaps the evidence will start speaking more loudly.  Because right now these horrors are hell bent on denying it.  And the joke is that neither of them can even manage elementary power analysis.  So it's not as if we can have a decent discussion. 

Just let it go.  It really isn't worth the effort.  They haven't got the wherewithal to know what they're doing.  And I'm not sure that I can blame them for that.  It just is what it is. 

Regards,
Rosemary

rosy, It's funny how you never questioned their ability to perform power analysis when their first observation of your circuit showed that it may have merit. Once they made the proper corrections to their readings and discovered that your circuit is of no value, all of a sudden they are incapable to do elementary power measurements.

Are the people who previously had the impression that your circuit showed signs of COP>1, still in agreement with your findings? What has changed to make them realize the truth about your circuit?

After 10 years, how many replicators are still in agreement with your findings?

If you find an "Expert", which has now been downgraded to an Academic, probably because you could not find and expert who was willing to entertain you, will he too be classified as being incapable of doing elementary power measurements when they reveal the truth about your circuit?

Now that you have a new circuit that has been around for only 2 months or so, will you be doing a continuous battery draw down test on it? I really hope you do not plan to use the same readings of your old circuit and try to apply them to the new circuit.

[MrMag]

Aaron also quoted further down on the same thread;

Not to my satisfaction. Because as a heater, COP 17 would be
phenomenal but at only a couple, it isn't worth the time. This is because
a heat pump water heater is 3.0~5 cop and overseas I have seen claims
of 6-7 cop but don't know if those are true, they retrofit any water heater
and replace the resistive elements.

So at minimum, for 600 watts, they already produce as much heat as a
3000+ watt resistive element water heater so cop 2.0 can't even
compete - not by a long-shot.

The Ainslie circuit would have to beat COP 3~5+ just to be able to
compete with simple heat pump technology.


The other document about the strange rosmary case or something like that, was an article that was put together by one of her own team members. I especially like the comment ,"Rosemary graciously agreed to be interviewed for this article from her home in South Africa, and answer a few brief questions". Why wouldn't she. He is part of the team. It really doesn't give the document much credibility at all.

[WilbyInebriated]

Aaron also quoted further down on the same thread;

Not to my satisfaction. Because as a heater, COP 17 would be
phenomenal but at only a couple, it isn't worth the time. This is because
a heat pump water heater is 3.0~5 cop and overseas I have seen claims
of 6-7 cop but don't know if those are true, they retrofit any water heater
and replace the resistive elements.

So at minimum, for 600 watts, they already produce as much heat as a
3000+ watt resistive element water heater so cop 2.0 can't even
compete - not by a long-shot.

The Ainslie circuit would have to beat COP 3~5+ just to be able to
compete with simple heat pump technology.

and this is saying what? that it has been investigated fully by aaron? i think the fact that aaron only achieved a cop of 2 and "efficiencies greater than “4″ have already been recorded in the recent 2009 replications" makes that line of argument moot. are you saying that improvements cannot be made? did the first internal combustion engines have the performance your current car does? etc. etc. ad infinitum, ad nauseam. look at what he (aaron) says about heat pumps, "3.0~5 cop and overseas I have seen claims of 6-7 cop". gee, they are making improvements to an old technology even now... see where i'm going with this? probably not. furthermore, the steve windisch article states glen got cop>4 which would put it dead smack in the middle of heat pump tech cop 3-5. how does that not compete as it stands with no improvement?
heck, in the same post he says he got cooling of over 2 degrees from ambient on certain components. "serious reverse entropy" he called it... but that's not worth investigating to you is it?

The other document about the strange rosmary case or something like that, was an article that was put together by one of her own team members. I especially like the comment ,"Rosemary graciously agreed to be interviewed for this article from her home in South Africa, and answer a few brief questions". Why wouldn't she. He is part of the team. It really doesn't give the document much credibility at all.

and in the same article steve interviews glen (fuzzytomcat)... so you are saying glen isn't credible now? for the record, the "team" was rosemary, aaron murakami, glen lettenmaier, harvey gramm, steve windisch, astweth. did i miss any rose?

[MrMag]

and this is saying what? that it has been investigated fully by aaron? i think the fact that aaron only achieved a cop of 2 and "efficiencies greater than “4″ have already been recorded in the recent 2009 replications" makes that line of argument moot. are you saying that improvements cannot be made? did the first internal combustion engines have the performance your current car does? etc. etc. ad infinitum, ad nauseam. look at what he (aaron) says about heat pumps, "3.0~5 cop and overseas I have seen claims of 6-7 cop". gee, they are making improvements to an old technology even now... see where i'm going with this? probably not. furthermore, the steve windisch article states glen got cop>4 which would put it dead smack in the middle of heat pump tech cop 3-5. how does that not compete as it stands with no improvement?
heck, in the same post he says he got cooling of over 2 degrees from ambient on certain components. "serious reverse entropy" he called it... but that's not worth investigating to you is it?

and in the same article steve interviews glen (fuzzytomcat)... so you are saying glen isn't credible now? for the record, the "team" was rosemary, aaron murakami, glen lettenmaier, harvey gramm, steve windisch, astweth. did i miss any rose?

Well, she has been working on the circuit for 10 years. You would think that there would have been something done with the circuit to show it's usefulness. But then again, it is still questionable if the circuit is overunity. You would also think that she would run a continuous test to prove that the circuit doesn't drain the batteries down as people here requested. I'm not talking about the 17 hour run or the few hours here and there to add up to the watt-hour rating, I'm talking of an extended test period where it would run continuously. It doesn't need to be babysat. Just take the initial battery reading and take it again a couple of months later.

How many of those "team" members still back rose. I think she has alienated most of them. And come on, Steve Windisch, what kind of qualifications does he have, as far as I've seen he is nothing but mouth.

[WilbyInebriated]

Well, she has been working on the circuit for 10 years. You would think that there would have been something done with the circuit to show it's usefulness. But then again, it is still questionable if the circuit is overunity. You would also think that she would run a continuous test to prove that the circuit doesn't drain the batteries down as people here requested. I'm not talking about the 17 hour run or the few hours here and there to add up to the watt-hour rating, I'm talking of an extended test period where it would run continuously. It doesn't need to be babysat. Just take the initial battery reading and take it again a couple of months later.

i noticed you didn't answer any of my questions...

How many of those "team" members still back rose. I think she has alienated most of them. And come on, Steve Windisch, what kind of qualifications does he have, as far as I've seen he is nothing but mouth.

how about you do a bit of your own due diligence mr. mags? is there something preventing you from reading the time stamp on the post by aaron @ energeticforum other than your love for speculation and assumption? for your lazy convenience, it was posted in early june of 2011... as far as steve's qualifications, you can do you own due diligence there as well... even though they are irrelevant. if you recall, it was glen's 'replication' that steve was referring to when he said cop>4. do you think he just pulled that out of a hat? or do you think maybe that is what glen told him when steve interviewed him...

and as far as i've seen tinselkoala is nothing but mouth... does that now discredit him? or is it only your opinion of someone that is the final arbiter?