Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary - It's surprising that you and your team hasn't tried to pinpoint the source of the extra energy, or at least narrow down the possibilities.

Golly Sprocket.  Actually the entire circuit design was intended to prove the source of extra energy away from the battery and in the material of the circuit itself.  That much, to all of us, was a given.  But that's in the thesis and I've learned that there's not that much interest in the thesis.  Therefore I sort of hold back here. Certainly  I know that the interest on these forums is in the more practical side of things.

Broadly the argument is this.  If the amount of energy discharged by a supply is less than the amount of energy dissipated on the circuit - then where does that energy come from?  That was proved in our previous experiments.  Now this has changed rather profoundly.  It's now this.  If the amount of energy returned to a battery EXCEEDS the amount of energy delivered by the battery in the first instance - then where does that energy come from?

In effect our proof is more comprehensive and anomalous as it relates to classical prediction.  And it takes the evidence to infinite COP - which as we all know - begs a closed system.  Now.  We won't prove this on batteries.  It's an obvious step - but I'm not prepared to go that route.  If we keep to a discussion on batteries and battery performance it will be an argument that will outlast my lifetime.  Hopefully you guys will get there with your replications or applications.  But we most certainly can point to something that appears to be closed - as you point to hereunder.  And our intention is to keep the discussion relevant to classical measurement protocols. But all I've ever tried to do is to resolve the measurements to prove the thesis.  That's my entire focus.  Indeed.  It's why I put this circuit together in the first instance.  And the thesis most assuredly proposes where that extra energy is from.  What's intended is to show that there's an energy supply source in all bound matter which is based on Einsteins mass/energy equivalence.  But, here's the thing.  When that matter has inductive and/or conductive atomic or molecular material - then that can be exploited to become an electric energy supply source.  But it's a different discussion Sprocket.  I'm not sure that it's needed here.

/quote]Here the proposal is that there are two entirely separate currents flowing to and from their respective sources.  The one induces the other - in line with inductive laws.  They're able to sustain each other because their paths are enabled by those circuit components.  And that 'stack' of MOSFETS is the 'path' for the current flow induced in the circuitry.  The fact is that the current does not 'die down' and yet there's measurable evidence of work done in the heat across the laod resistor.  All very much predicted and very much in line with that thesis. 

[quote author=Sprocket link=topic=10407.msg279744#msg279744 date=1301436083I was reading up on some of your earlier posts and I see you mention that lower inductance seemed to enhance the effect. You also talked about where you increased the duty-cycle of your function generator to max - which was about 3min, that's a lot! - and during the mosfet-off stage, the parasitic oscillations continue for the duration, with no apparent reductance in heat produced, and for the full 3min, while there is no power being drawn from the battery!  The opposite in fact, the battery is apparently being charged during this time - am I reading this correctly?  If so, WOW!  In fact, is there any need for a periodic waveform at all?  Wouldn't a simple 555 monostable circuit do instead, something to basically just start it off?  Or even a push-switch? Anyway, I've lots to think about, but I can't do much till I order some stuff.

Indeed that oscillation lasts for nearly 3 minutes.  This is so nice.  It seems that the significance of this 'time' is getting through. Stefan has drawn a circuit design by Neptune to see if this can simply be triggered once - and then left to oscillate.  I'm hoping to perhaps get someone to build that circuit.  But no joy yet.  I think the team are all busy trying to earn a living.   

Nice stuff Sprocket.  Always a pleasure to see someone 'getting it'. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[DreamThinkBuild]

Hi Rosemary,

Here are real world reference values from some of my heater collection.

Volts, Heater wattage rating, Ohms measured

12vdc, 40 watt , 10 ohms (Cattle/Horse tank warmer)
12vdc, 200 watt, 1 ohm   (Livestock tank de-icer)
12vdc, 600 watt, 0.5 ohm (Works good as a dump load)

120vac, 180watt, 146 ohm (Electric blanket)
120vac, 660watt, 30 ohm (Old style nichrome wire hot plate)
120vac, 1000watt, 15 ohm (Hot plate)
120vac, 1500watt, 6 ohms (Toaster oven, 1 heater bar)

240vac, 3800watt, 20 ohm (Water tank heater)
240vac, 5500watt, 10 ohm (Fast hot water tank heater)

Hi Neptune,

Got to watch out when riding a bike and catching a glimpse of a pretty lady walking down the street, glad your ok. 

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello indeed, DreamThinkBuild.

That's a really nice collection of resistors.  Well done. 



Kindest regards,
rosemary

[neptune]

Good day everyone . Been out on the bike early today . Leg working much better , and thanks for kind comments . @ Sprocket . It is important to notice that during the 2.7 minutes of parasitic oscillation the gate is negative relative to ground . So although pulsing may be unnecessary once oscillation starts , the negative state could well be indispensable .The internet is great in that we have global communication , but it does not actually permit us to meet and swap parts and physically work together . A scope [or half scope] will enable you to see the parasitic oscillation . I would also be interested to hear of anyone hearing the oscillation on an AM radio . For commercial applications , RF screening may be necessary to prevent radio interference . There are well tried and tested ways to do this .

[Sprocket]

@Rosemary - Yikes, now I realise why you normally don't expand more on what you believe to be the true source of the energy, especially here - that's more along the lines of alchemy than electricity, I bet people have been lynched for lesser heresies!

@neptune - As I posted earlier, my first attempt at this was when Rosemary was posting at EF and all I managed to achieve then was blow a few mosfets.  What I wasn't doing was taking the gate negative, so I'm sure that it must be vitally important - at least I couldn't find anything interesting happening just taking it to zero.  Incidently, my 'element' then was a length of resistance-wire pulled from a toaster and wrapped around a tin-can, insulated of course.  14 Ohms resistance, I forget what the inductance measured was.  Not sure if this this helped or hindered...