Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi again Magsy.  It seems that there was an error in your calculations.  It's disappointing - but we're depending on your resilience and that all energetic intellect.  As woopy says - it's almost proof of OU all on its own.  I think we're all rather relying on you to find that invincible argument. So. Don't give up that elusive design.  It seems that our own is simply never going to cut it - certainly not on these forums.

And this is for Dr No.  The good news is that the price of petrol just keeps going north.  That's catalyst enough to change our dependencies.  It's not only toxic for the environment - but I think Nature Herself is working to put it out of reach.  I am reasonably certain that it's a simple thing to get energy back to the battery on motors - which means that it should be feasible to apply this to our electric cars.  In theory it would result in less battery weight to more energy out - and a longer duration of those batteries notwithstanding.

Until a day or so ago - I've rather tried to encourage others to think applications.  I sort of saw my own input as being restricted to my very limited knowledge.  But I've been discussing a very simple design configuration with a friend.  I'll sketch it and then photograph it and then see if I can manage to upload it here.  But it's a design I've referred to before.  And until I do this, here's a description - for those who care tp wrap their minds around it.

Two batteries in series - negative to positive and positive to negative.  Battery one has our circuit leading to the negative of battery two.  Battery two has our circuit leading to the positive of battery one.  Switches need to work in antiphase - and since it is evident that these oscillations do not depend on switching frequencies - then - also theoretically - it may work with a reed switch - and diodes across those switches.  Then.  As I see it - the one battery will also - always - discharge into the second to recharge it.  Surely that's a closed system?  Something like that.  Perhaps Magsy can see what he can do with this on a simulator.

Also.  I've now taken the trouble - yesterday - to inform an influential scientist at local government level - here in Cape Town.  A surprising level of interest.  Also surprising to me is that he had never even heard of our efforts here.  I forget that our contributions on the internet are still very much a minority thing and that the general public are ENTIRELY unaware of it.  It will be interesting to see where that discussion goes.  A lot of questions - a discussion spanning over an hour - and - dare I say it - a sense that there was enough residual interest to actually explore these claims of ours.  We'll see.  In the face of repeated disappointments - then I'm not sure I can invest in too much hope.  But without some hope I think that all our efforts here would be a complete waste of time.

Anyway.  That's the best I can manage for now.  Hopefully it's something to keep some heart and hope in these extraordinary reaches of ours.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[Magluvin]

Hey Rose

Its weird. A couple days ago I could wake up and knew that i had it.
Now, hmmm.   hmmmm.    but Im bouncing back.

We still gained positive ideas that is not widely known to all.
I see it has all been done before. Maybe not all.  ;]

As for your setup, there will be many that want to see those batteries charging.  Its common simple proving grounds. Like Steorn, even when some of the projects even worked at all, there was no real convincing. 
Perhaps if you concentrated on getting enough charge back to the batteries, to say get each one to be above 13v when the circuit is running, this would be a sure winner for you. Im not sure what you think on that kind of plan.
Small amounts of energy can be produced with a radiant energy charger ir a crystal radio. But most really want the beef.
So if we have an amplifier of the 3rd kind, the crystal radio can then be the source, because the amplifier of the 3rd kind has beef. Its the 3rd kind that will get quick notice.;]



Heck, I thought I might have had it. If the circuit used low inductance, the freq of operation with skimming, that would be impressive. lol I think I worried more about MORE and neglected important things.
But in your setup, now your at the point of more is better planning. ;]

My real issue was thinking my stages, by the 3rd stage took me over the top more than 2nd.  But what was happening is, I got stuck in to the habit of, when I only had to put 2 caps during testing in series, the outcome WAS 10uf to 5uf, divided by 2.   So when I got to the 3rd and 4th stages, instead of dividing how many caps,as there were more than 2, I relied on my habit of divide the total capacitance by 2.   

The sim acts up with too much going on, switches open and closed everywhere and the sim doesnt like open ended diodes in the circuit with big things happening in connection with them. So I was doing stages independently.  Ant least we didnt waste months on it and still have more to do. 

Lol  when point had posted that he saw 5uf and I saw 20uf, I drew it on papaer and bam, I new I was wrong.  So I thought quickly if I still had gain with 2 stages(4 caps to series), I made the same golly ;] mistake I had been making and quickly posted that I would post a solution at lunch.  Went home and spent 40min finding I was in
Disney Land from hell.  I was all day, what was I thinking!!! Stupid mistake. Should have put it together to make sure, but I was running the stages as a single stage in the sim, and just making my own conversions, with mistakes. Thats a sad story. lol

Thanks for everything Rose  =]
Im not goin anywhere. ;]

Mags

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Magsy.  I had a bad night.  But I've got through it.  I can't run that test on batteries unless I buy another set - and I simply cna't afford it Mags.  And the batteries that were donated will take WAY too long to drain - if ever.  I haven't got the patience or the time or the interest to prove it that way.  My experience is that when we did give this as proof we weren't allowed to pubish the data.  So.  I've given up on using that argument.  But it SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED.  The waveforms, the numbers, the evidence is absolutely as dependable as is required.  It's just that the facts are unpopular and therefore are being contended.   And that they're not even using valid argument is entirely lost on their readers.  It's all a bit disheartening and intellectually disgusting.  Still there's possibly some good financial compensation to wallow in all that disgusting intellectual abuse.

I know you'll bounce back Mags.  There's just way too much interest there.  Maybe you can try out that circuit I mentioned on your sim.  And please - DON'T ask for battery voltage to climb.  It's diametrically opposed to the thesis.  I just can't see how this can happen.  I can see it climbing fractionally - to its full potential.  But if a 12 volt battery climbed to 14 or 17 volts - as I've seen from a recharge - and it did it from our circuit - then it would also disprove the thesis at a very fundamental level.  It would be very bad news.  If that's the data that you guys are looking for - then it would be really bad news for me.

Anyway.  Take good care.  Hopefully you're already asleep and will read here when you wake up.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I've sort of found my way to a really exciting thread guys.  Life may yet be worth living.  I'll post a link here if I can manage it.  Anyway it's that thread on cold fusion. 

GREAT NEWS
Rosmary

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10230.msg280805#msg280805

[Poit]

I've sort of found my way to a really exciting thread guys.  Life may yet be worth living.  I'll post a link here if I can manage it.  Anyway it's that thread on cold fusion. 

GREAT NEWS
Rosmary

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10230.msg280805#msg280805

When you finalise the open source of your project, you will post full schematics of the invention here.. right?