Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

P.S. - Modern physics allows for 1. the motion of electrons,or 2 the motion of their quantum charge exchange, or 3 both at the same time, depending on the medium and source of the potential difference that is forcing the energy exchange.

In solid metal conductors for example, electron flow may be better characterised as the flow of exchange of phonons between the valence electrons of the conductor. In essence, the transmission of energy by electron wavelength "sound". A compression and expansion of the valence electron's total field energy and volume, due to the exchange of quantized packets of energy, passing from electron to electron, in a similar (but not same) way to that of ordinary sound propagation.

Cheers

Golly Hoptoad.  That's really way out.  I had no idea.  I first thought you meant to write photons.  I see now that you really didn't.  This is all way out of my league. 

Very impressed.

Rosemary

[poynt99]

Finally,

Two scope shots worth looking at and investigating:

SCRN0313.jpg
SCRN0315.jpg

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Finally,

Two scope shots worth looking at and investigating:

SCRN0313.jpg
SCRN0315.jpg

.99

No Poynty.  They're NOT right.  They're undersampled.  They are not the whole of the cycle.  I'm well aware of the fact that they give a very favourable result - especially in terms of our argument.  But they do not give the full picture.  They are UNDERSAMPLED.  TRULY UNDERSAMPLED.  Is that you you meant?  You WANT us to undersample?  In which case - that would certainly put paid to any acceptance of any of the results that we present.  VERY strange you are Poynty.  I'd be inclined to think that you want us to disgrace ourselves with the wrong presentation.  You really do take us all for fools. 

Rosemary

[cHeeseburger]

Finally,

Two scope shots worth looking at and investigating:

SCRN0313.jpg
SCRN0315.jpg

.99

Rose, do you know why the burst envelope now has three distinct portions instead of just the two?  Seems like when the oscillations begin, they are rather large for about 30 seconds and then they abruptly fall off to a steady but much lower level.  Is this something to do with the driving waveform or just another unsolved mystery?  Seem like it started acting like this after whatever that problem was that took days to fix got mended.  Just curious.

Does the new tri-state burst envelope improve the performance or is it still the same? 

By the way...

The accepted definition of undersampling per Nyquist is when there are less than two evenly-spaced samples taken during the period of the highest frequency of interest.


Humbugger

[MrMag]

Finally,

Two scope shots worth looking at and investigating:

SCRN0313.jpg
SCRN0315.jpg

.99

I really hate to butt into this pissing match but I agree with you Poynt99. These are the actual waveforms that need to be seen. However, I really don't think you'll ever get Rosemary to see it that way.

It's like turning on a light switch for 2.08 minutes. I can look at the whole on/off cycle on my scope but it doesn't really tell me whats going on in the circuit. I really need to see only 2 to 4 cycles on my scope to see whats going on.