Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

Rosemary Ainslie · April 17, 2011, 05:39:19 AM

So All - we have the really exciting evidence of NOT ONLY COP>1 BUT INFINITE COP. We have the irrefutable evidence that there is more energy returned to a battery than was first supplied. This, in terms of ALL CLASSICAL THEORY is IMPOSSIBLE. Yet.

CLEARLY on the simplest of simple circuits - it is very much evident. YET AGAIN. We are measuring more current returned to a supply than was delivered by that supply. And we are, nonetheless, measuring between 4 and 7 watts dissipated as heat over the resistor element.

SO. That's some seriously good news. Certainly for anyone who hopes for some resolution to our pollutant excesses in our use of energy.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

BTW I keep stressing this in the hopes that Poynty and his minions will get used to the term OVER UNITY and all the alarming extremes including INFINITE COP. That way, perhaps through pure repetition - we can diminish some of the harm that they've managed through pure repetition of the INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS related to THERMODYNAMIC LAWS.

I will definitely move on from here at the next post - but am having difficulty in marshalling the full argument - and there are MANY QUESTIONS still to be addressed.

gauschor · April 17, 2011, 05:54:59 AM

There is a lot of talk in this topic, yet I am missing a decent proof or demonstration. Please show something substantial.

Rosemary Ainslie · April 17, 2011, 06:04:27 AM

Quote from: gauschor on April 17, 2011, 05:54:59 AM
There is a lot of talk in this topic, yet I am missing a decent proof or demonstration. Please show something substantial.

Indeed. Here are the links

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/03/dear-reader-finally-heres-our-video-on.html

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/03/report.html

I trust - that unlike Poynty - you may enjoy all this evidence. The first is the visual evidence. . The second is the details of WHAT WAS DEMONSTRATED.

Kindest regards Gauschor

Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie · April 17, 2011, 08:31:19 AM

Guys - that tireless misinformant on Poynty's 'TEAM VINCIBLE' widely identified as Pickle - has come up with an analogy. He claims that this 'discovery' if such it is - is to be seen as Rosemary's baby - but that - instead of a demon - I have given birth to an angel. And for some reason I'm not prepared to weigh it. The analogy is flawed on every possible level.

In the first instance the circuit is NOT MINE. It is a simple switching circuit. It is well known and widely used. It carries no exceptional components - and, notwithstanding the tedious insistance by some of Poynty's dogs - it has no 'tailor made' components. Everything off the shelf. In the second instance - nor have I discovered counter electromotive force - which has been widely understood many, many years before my interest in physics. In the third instance - nor have I discovered parasitic oscillations - another well known and well documented phenomenon. In the fourth instance - nor was I the discoverer of Inductive Laws. That was Faraday.

5. Nor did I discover how to measure them - as that was Maxwell. 6. Nor did I advance the concepts of energy in matter that resulted in our mass/energy equivalence principles - because that was Einstein. 7. Nor did I discover the dark energy that I think we're accessing - because that was our astrophysicists - from Zwicky - right up to Ellis et al at Caltech. 8 Nor did I discover hidden dimensions - because that was done and dusted by our string theorists.

So. In truth - there is not one aspect of this entire development that can be attributed to my skills. Rather - if there's any tribute to be given - it's to those tireless and patient guys who kept putting circuits up to show these principles. I could not even do that. And then, obviously, some considerable and heartfelt tribute needed to be paid to those actual giants in physics who are listed above.

In the unlikely event that anything at all can be attributed to my own skills it is that I took their theories way more to heart than the most of you electrical engineers and treated those miracles of conceptual insights with the respect that they deserve. I have also, I hope, had the courage to stand up to an unwavering attack by those dedicated bigots that polluted these forums in their concerted efforts to deny any possibility EVER of defeating our Thermodynamic Laws.

So Pickle. I would suggest that what you're actually promoting is the need for some incorrect measurements. I can understand that. It's the only way left to you, Poynty and that rather sad collective of thugs and lady bashers - to try and get these results refuted. And I fully appreciate the need. I'd venture a guess and go so far as to say that your livlihoods depend on it.

Golly.
Rosemary

And may I add. Nor did I discover how to measure this energy. That was mainstream and it's based on vi dt. You keep wanting this changed. Why? If you average anything at all then you are NOT measuring correctly. It wouldn't make a blind bit of difference if you averaged the results on this waveform in any event. But it would certainly manage to skew results for anyone who believes you here. It's just that whatever results they then come up with will be 'thrown out' by our learned and revered. And their opinion matters just so much more than your own. It is round about here that your own credentials become entirely compromised.

gauschor · April 17, 2011, 10:28:59 AM

The blog and the video proves nothing. With something substantial I mean: attach a load to your COP 17 circuit, preferably a motor and let it run a long time - while on the same time the circuit charges up the batteries which power the motor. Should be easy with COP17, ain't it? Otherwise I don't know what all the fuss here is about.