Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

Rosemary Ainslie · March 25, 2011, 10:11:57 AM

Guys, I need to alert you all - again - to the fact that for those of you who contribute to this thread - then you are all, any one of you, likely to be the recipients of personal messages or emails - from one of three members and ex members to this forum. They will, inevitably be intended to throw doubt on these numbers and these test results and their intention is to systematically errode any credibility related to these test results.

The latest is, apparently, that I am 'skewing' the results to accommodate my thesis. I CANNOT skew results. They are carefully recorded and that record is NOT made by me but by a machine. And I am INDEED using the evidence in support of the thesis. The thesis preceded this test as can STILL be PROVED. I make NO APOLOGY for this. It is my rights to do so. But NOR have I FORCED that thesis onto this thread. Therefore no-one is obliged or even expected to familiarise themselves with it. Good heavens. Should I be apologising for this? For some reason?

Rosemary

poynt99 · March 25, 2011, 10:21:05 AM

Rose,

If you can not arrange the batteries such that the first and last in the series are next to each other, then YES, use a length of wire (it does not have to be heavy wire as it is not carrying any current) necessary to reach the probe tip.

Try to keep this wire as short as possible, and avoid having this sense wire running along side parallel with any of the current-carrying wires, to avoid induction to the measurement wire.

Stefan, attached are the PSpice simulation files.

.99

Rosemary Ainslie · March 25, 2011, 10:33:50 AM

Quote from: poynt99 on March 25, 2011, 10:21:05 AM
Rose,

If you can not arrange the batteries such that the first and last in the series are next to each other, then YES, use a length of wire (it does not have to be heavy wire as it is not carrying any current) necessary to reach the probe tip.

Try to keep this wire as short as possible, and avoid having this sense wire running along side parallel with any of the current-carrying wires, to avoid induction to the measurement wire.

Stefan, attached are the PSpice simulation files.

.99

Poynty - I know how to do this. I only need to wrap a small wire around the neck of the terminals. Neptune has explained this. We need to arrange the batteries that the negative first in series is next to the positive last in series. That way the probes can span both.

Now. I've set a good example here Poynty Point. I'm bending over backwards to accommodate your ask. Please return the favour and give us a picture of those simulations. I'm not sure if others struggle as I do. But it would be so nice to alleviate any struggles at all. Just size it that it doesn't fall off the page. Ta muchly Poynty.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

poynt99 · March 25, 2011, 10:51:39 AM

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on March 25, 2011, 10:33:50 AM
Please return the favour and give us a picture of those simulations. I'm not sure if others struggle as I do. But it would be so nice to alleviate any struggles at all. Just size it that it doesn't fall off the page. Ta muchly Poynty.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

I've already posted the sim scope shots and schematic in png format. The file above only contains the necessary files to run the simulation on PSpice.

.99

Rosemary Ainslie · March 25, 2011, 11:46:54 AM

Quote from: poynt99 on March 25, 2011, 10:51:39 AM
I've already posted the sim scope shots and schematic in png format. The file above only contains the necessary files to run the simulation on PSpice.

.99

Sorry Pointy. Good stuff. I was hoping you were giving us a shot without any discharge across the shunt. Have you tried this yet? It would be interesting to see if can be done.

Kindest regards,
Rosie