Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[cHeeseburger]

golly guys.  I've just had the batteries catch fire.  Connecting leads vaporised.  How's that for proof of energy.  I was careless with one of those connections - I think.  Not actually sure what happened.  I'll test their voltage again when I've settled my nerves a bit. 

Good heavens.  I've heard about this happening.  Never actually seen it.

Regards,
Rosemary

You might want to throw in a few well-placed fuses, maybe 10 Amps rated, in your battery wiring there Rosemary.  DC arcing can be very dangerous and your batteries hold enough juice to do some real damage.

Humbugger

[nul-points]

hi Rosemary

...battery caught fire?

no - you must be imagining it**!!!!      LOL

hope you & equipment all ok!


(** Poynt99 will simulate your circuit again later...  i'm sure he'll be able to assure you that your battery could not possibly catch fire)


thought you might be interested in the following link about recent discoveries relating to magnetic 'current' (if you haven't already seen it):

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/69822/title/Magnetricity_behaves_like_electricity


PS  it would be helpful (and responsible!) to people attempting replications of your system to make them aware of any other issues which you've found which have resulted in damage to components and/or equipment


kind regards
np

http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com

[twinbeard]

Hi Rosemary,

I can't remember if you were using vented or sealed batteries, but let me share a little insight.  I have a 640W solar array on my roof.  It charges 1600Ah of vented lead acid L-16 batteries.  Once a month, the charge controller will bump up the voltage and boil the batteries a little bit, cleaning sulfation off the plates in the process.  Consequently, once a month, I need to add a total of a gallon or so of distilled water to the 24 individual cells.

This was designed to run a specially optimized computer network in off-grid situations.  There is a little headroom left after the load is applied... 2A of continuous use worth, on average.  When I started building pulse motors and other aetheric based power devices, I used this free source of energy as my dipole to work from.  After about a year of such research, I am noticing that I need 2 gallons per month to top off the batteries.  Further, I am noticing that battery voltage stays higher than ever after sundown, and for longer.  Mind you, these batteries are pushing 6 years old, and I have never configured them to be charged by the radiant pulses... only to supply the source dipole.

One of my pulse motors in particular can push the voltage of smaller batteries too high.  If you leave a small SLA on for too long... bye bye battery.  I suspect the same "boiling" is happening until there is no viable electrolyte left.

What really tipped me off to what was happening, and what is obviously happening with your circuit was when I paralleled a 20V 1F capacitor with the 12V bus on my bench, which is paralleled by 30 feet or so of #14 AWG to the battery bank described above.  This particular cap was made for car audio, and has a digital voltmeter built into it.  I also have a remote display for the solar charge controller, that shows the voltage at the battery terminals.  To my surprise, with several pulse motors running, the cap showed a higher voltage than the batteries.  It occured to me that energy was essentially radiating in all directions possible out of those circuits, including back into the source dipole.  It took some head scratching to figure out just what was going on.  Now, I just smile, and add that extra gallon of water to the batteries every month.  I hope that helps;)

Cheers,
Twinbeard.

golly guys.  I've just had the batteries catch fire.  Connecting leads vaporised.  How's that for proof of energy.  I was careless with one of those connections - I think.  Not actually sure what happened. e I'll test their voltage again when I've settled my nerves a bit. 

Good heavens.  I've heard about this happening.  Never actually seen it.

Regards,
Rosemary

[evolvingape]

I could not get near to balancing that wattage dissipated/delivered number that I was looking for.  In fact, so embarrassed was I by these results that I simply omitted them from my report.

Well right there is a damning statement direct from your own lips. You could not get the number you were looking for from the results so you omitted those "spurious" results from your report. This is generally considered amongst scientists with integrity to be "rigging the results to fit an agenda". Now we have proof you were knowingly and deliberately engaged in this. Thankyou.

What's happened to all that integrity?  It's a sad day when you have to invent facts to duck an open admission of error. 

golly guys.  I've just had the batteries catch fire.  Connecting leads vaporised.  How's that for proof of energy.  I was careless with one of those connections - I think.  Not actually sure what happened.  I'll test their voltage again when I've settled my nerves a bit. 

Good heavens. I've heard about this happening.  Never actually seen it.

OK... So your using the fact that your sealed maintenance free silver calcium batteries caught fire as "proof of energy". Yes Rosemary, a battery contains energy

I have seen this lots of times in these types of batteries, it is not uncommon. Normally it is not caused by incompetent wiring, as the people who work on these batteries know what they are doing, as it's dangerous! These batteries are perfectly capable of catching fire in a standard DC circuit that is COP<1.

So what "proof of energy" are you implying ?

Oh yeah, you have typed lots of words and completely ignored Cheeseburgers perfectly valid questions in reply #527. Why ?

RM

[Rosemary Ainslie]

hi Rosemary

(** Poynt99 will simulate your circuit again later...  i'm sure he'll be able to assure you that your battery could not possibly catch fire)

thought you might be interested in the following link about recent discoveries relating to magnetic 'current' (if you haven't already seen it):

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/69822/title/Magnetricity_behaves_like_electricity


PS  it would be helpful (and responsible!) to people attempting replications of your system to make them aware of any other issues which you've found which have resulted in damage to components and/or equipment


kind regards
np

http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com

Hello nul-points.  I'm going to photograph the damage to my crocodile clips.  It's wild.  Gave me a bit of a heart attack.

I've read that article.  But thanks for reminding me.  Magnetic fields are the entire foundation of the thesis.  But - theory is not of much interest here.  But nor does it matter.  Just as long as the experimental evidence is taken into account.

The thought of Poynty duplicating my test is laughable.  I'm inclined to predict he'll possibly find a loss.  Curious to see what scope he uses - or if he's going to measure everything with a DMM.  Anyway - we'll see.

It seems that Hamburger did NOT put up that blogspot to invite comments against me.  Greatly encouraged.  I know that he always tells the truth.  If I can find a link about this I'll repost it.  His general integrity and honesty is something I've dealt with in the past.  I am now getting the general impression that he actually rather likes me.  He just hides it well.  Golly.  What a relief. 

Take care nul-points
Kindest regards,


Rosemary

btw - regarding a list of the possible dangers in this apparatus of ours.  The biggest hazard is leaving me alone with all those switches.  Fortunately I'd just disconnected the scope probe.  and the lead to the apparatus.  I think I must have disconnected something wrongly - or touched something.  Just don't know.  BUT I'll see if I can prepare a schedule of what to look out for.  Just know it's pretty  comprehensive list because I'm hopelessly myopic.