Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[happyfunball]

\There is at LEAST one working device on show that has been working perpetually for some many years now.  I just, for the life of me, can't remember the man's name.  If I do I'll \

Reidar Finsrud

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=us7YB7eiOeQ

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Reidar Finsrud

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=us7YB7eiOeQ

Thanks Happy.  That's the one I remembered.  But how nice to know that there's two.  So.  Someone should get hold of Randi and claim that prize for either of those two estates - OR BOTH.  And I'm reasonably satisfied that - provided this is handled by some legal experts - then I doubt that Randi would be able to refute those prizes.  Golly.  If Utilitarian or someone here actually rallies for the prize money on behalf of those estates - then I imagine they'd be able to claim a reasonable fee for all that effort from that prize money. 

And we actually need these examples in the front page of EVERY TEXT BOOK ON THE PLANET.  That way when we're subjected to all that disclaiming drivel against perpetual motion then we'll be better reminded of the quality of that drivel. 

Please note that I have more than a sneaking suspicion that our Mookie has a vested interest in the Koeberg Nuclear Expansion program.  Wonder if that's perhaps, why he's been trying to besmirch my good name. 

Golly.  Whatever next?
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And MileHigh.  The master of the mot juste.  The wizard of the perfectly balanced sentence.  The artiste of greatest clarity.  What a waste of talent.  Read my little exposition again.  If I have erred or wandered too near the truth - just bear in mind - I was using analogy.  I wonder why it is that you assumed anything else?

And if you and Pickle and others want to quote me - as you so often do - then please include the entire passage.  Else the sense of what I'm trying to communicate is lost.  And I'd then be inclined to think that you were simply quoting me out of context or - God forbid - propagandising.  And thank God - your little forum gets all the attention that it deserves - which is negligible.   

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

And BTW.  What MileHigh can you and Pickle do about all that evidence of perpetual motion?  Do you just deny this too?  I'd be interested to see if your language skills are also equal to dismissing this evidence as well.



 

[poynt99]

Are you going to do the continuous operation test?

If not, why not?

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Are you going to do the continuous operation test?

If not, why not?

.99

Poynty Point.  Do you EVER read what I write?  OF COURSE I'LL DO THIS.  But first get me 5 or so EXPERTS to advise me in writing that this will constitute ABSOLUTE PROOF - and I'll gladly run all the required tests and their controls.  Then - when those tests are concluded I will require those same experts to acknowledge those results in writing.  GOOD HEAVENS.  Historically we haven't got a single expert to even acknowledge perpetual motion - notwithstanding the evidence.  Not a good thing Poynty.  You must admit.  I sort of imagine myself beetling around until the day I die and then hearing you all say - 'NOT GOOD ENOUGH.  Until it's run for 1000 years - it's just hearsay'.  You see for yourself what our poor Mr Reider Finsrud managed. 

As ever,
Rosie