Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

nul-points · April 23, 2011, 05:49:53 PM

Quote from: poynt99 on April 23, 2011, 01:10:11 PM

I think the folks here could benefit from seeing something helpful in your posts. Acting like a smartass does not quite qualify.

.99

LOL @ the Pontiff

i shall continue to post whatever i believe to be most apposite at the time

i'm not drawing any conclusions as to whether Rosemary's current experiment is valid or invalid until i see relevant data from her (or her team)

members of OU.com will gauge you by your treatment of her - and beating on Rosemary with a big stick is unlikely to convince her to comply with your demands

poynt99 · April 23, 2011, 06:09:51 PM

Quote from: nul-points on April 23, 2011, 05:49:53 PM
LOL @ the Pontiff

i shall continue to post whatever i believe to be most apposite at the time

...and so shall I.

I know you're a big fan and can't help yourself, but kindly refrain from the lame 'poynt' references. I certainly have not ever made them myself using your moniker (up until your lesson that is).

Quote
i'm not drawing any conclusions as to whether Rosemary's current experiment is valid or invalid until i see relevant data from her (or her team)

You will be waiting a very long time then my friend.

Quote
members of OU.com will gauge you by your treatment of her - and beating on Rosemary with a big stick is unlikely to convince her to comply with your demands

Perhaps. The only thing that IS important however, is that one be truthful, forthcoming, and willing to learn and accept when they've made an error. IMO, we've not seen much of that from Rose.

If I'm wrong in any of my assertions, or my analysis, please clearly point it out. There is much emotional flak being thrown at it all, but no one can seem to muster any kind of technical argument one way or the other. Why don't you start nul?

I'm interested in the truth. Why aren't you?

.99

poynt99 · April 23, 2011, 06:36:13 PM

Quote from: Sprocket on April 23, 2011, 05:46:41 PM
Longitudinal waves as opposed to the Hertzian wave "FE is impossible" club you obviously belong to! As to its relevancy, I think I'm right in saying that Rosemary has stated already that in her opinion, the alleged 'artifact' cannot be modelled with simulation software - so let me direct the same question to you, what are you doing here flooding her thread with simulations, and what has it got to do with the thread topic?

What exactly is a Longitudinal wave, sprocket? How is it related to the Ainslie device and this thread?

I'm performing simulations (similar to those done by Rose) at this time to address some real issues with the current status quo. I'm examining the circuit at a level necessary to scope out unseen pitfalls in the measurements being taken by her and her team.

What are you doing here that is constructive in any way?

.99

Sprocket · April 23, 2011, 07:08:11 PM

Quote from: poynt99 on April 23, 2011, 06:36:13 PM
What exactly is a Longitudinal wave, sprocket? How is it related to the Ainslie device and this thread?

I'm performing simulations (similar to those done by Rose) at this time to address some real issues with the current status quo. I'm examining the circuit at a level necessary to scope out unseen pitfalls in the measurements being taken by her and her team.

What are you doing here that is constructive in any way?

.99

Longitudinal waves is where Tesla said the magic lies and that is good enough for me! If you are looking for me to get all technical then you are going to be disappointed - or not as is probably the case. Or are you suggesting that they do not exist? If that's not the case, does current simulation software model them - that's a question, since you apparently specialise in this area? This I already asked in the form of a question, but you ignored that!

Are you suggesting that I do not have a right to post on a public forum, whereas its permissible for you to hound Rosemary Ainslie from forum to forum, trash her threads, all the while denying her a venue on you own forum? Come to think of it, what are you even doing here at OU? If you think your piss-poor attitude is somwhow going to scare me off, you are sadly mistaken.

poynt99 · April 23, 2011, 08:28:41 PM

You trying to educate me about how SPICE can not simulate scalar or longitudinal waves when you can not even tell me what they are, I find quite comical, and frankly, it's pitiable.

Regarding the question, let me try to be more specific, since you have apparently mistaken the context:

What have you posted in this thread that has been constructive in any way? How have you been able to help progress the collective goal of understanding the circuit, the measurements, the actual connections, the real schematic, the assumptions, the oversights, etc. etc.? don't bother answering btw.

By doing the simulations and posting the results, insights and conclusions, I am providing at the very least, food for thought, and hopefully at best, the actual solutions to the enigma we're involve in here.

I would very much like to focus on getting to the bottom of this very technical challenge, so if you don't mind, I would suggest that unless you have some specific technical issue you wish to address me with, you refrain from engaging in any further flame throwing along my direction. This applies to more than just you.

Thanks,

.99