Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

Started by hartiberlin, February 20, 2011, 06:14:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 33 Guests are viewing this topic.

eisnad karm

RomeoUK has a convincing demo...no batteries needed. He has a few other tricks up his sleeve that can be developed further including an inovative solidstate system.
I think most of the crow has shifted over there. Keep up your work i am sure oneday you will have something that is straighforward.

poynt99

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on May 08, 2011, 11:49:19 PM
No actually.  The net value is 0.9 Ohms.  And then only during the oscillation phase.
Indeed it is 1.15 Ohms. Explain How you arrived at your erroneous conclusion?

Familiarize yourself with the facts. Total Impedance (at oscillation) is:

Z = R + jX, where R is the real part (0.25), and jX is the imaginary part (0.9).

Quote
Not actually.  It's outside my competence to build any circuit at all.
YOU, your team, your friends etc. etc. have had those two schematics for some time. The point being, the design was already at hand.  ::)

Quote
And yes.  I remember your quarrel with our measurements.  it was all to do with undersampling, then the position of the ground from the signal generator - and then a general complaint about the inductance on our circuit.  I am actually in need of valid objections.
Incorrect on all counts actually. You've really not been paying attention to anything I've said in the last two weeks (or more). Actually based on my experience, that's probably not the case; it's more a case of misinterpretation of what I've said.

Quote
Far from it.  I've got those photos.  But you'll have to wait for the download.
Good.

.99
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

Rosemary Ainslie

Poynty - I'm taking this our conversation off forum for now.  You can continue to argue here.  I won't.  I will email you.

Rosemary

poynt99

Regarding your email Rose, the post I am suggesting you review is this one:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.msg284238#msg284238

If something is not clear in that post, just say so and I will try to elucidate on anything you wish.

.99
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

Rosemary Ainslie

Poynty ?  This definitely needs a thread post.  I am not sure that I understand you. You log in certain circuit parameters into PSpice.  You hit the play button and it gives results?  Something like that.  Are you saying that you had to invert your probe positions to find that negative number?

Or are you arguing that it is meaningless precisely because it gave a negative result? 

Sorry that's the best I could do with what you've written.

Kindest regards,
Rosie