Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[vonwolf]

And may I add that it's a matter of some considerable concern to me that Glen is allowed to litter and pollute this thread with this ridiculous and confrontational and rude posts - and that Harti, notwithstanding repeated requests - is not prepared to do anything about it.

It is almost as if he DOES NOT WANT THIS NEWS TO BREAK.  It is almost as if he ACTUALLY WANTS THIS THREAD TO BE INCINERATED.

I find that extraordinary.  In the light of the evidence that we now have to hand on PROOF of COP INFINITY - then one would assume that he would do everything to nurture rather than KILL OFF this knowledge.  I CANNOT understand it - not with the best will in the world.  WHY?  WHY when so much evidence is to hand is he most earnestly attempting to block the information?  Is it because he'd prefer that the news does not come from me?  Is he selecting the proof that he requires - instead of the proof as it's presented?  Is there some kind of selection in play?  Or is it perhaps that he does not actually support this drive of ours to crack the energy barriers?  Or must this information first come from a MAN - as opposed to a WOMAN?  Not sure?  I give up.  All I know is that he is positively and anxiously ensuring that this thread get flamed.

I also need you to all be alert to this.  I personally am doubly concerned that the romero test may - indeed - have been a required distraction to this our news.  It certainly seems that way.

Regards,
Rosemary

  Hi Rose;
  Glens post just make him look silly, he's just repeating the same thing over and over again I know I don't pay him any attention and I doubt anyone els dose. His little trick of resizing the pages is very annoying and I wish it would stop but desperate time and all. Just keep moving forward and let him dwell inn the past, no  harm done.
  Good Luck as always Pete

[Rosemary Ainslie]

  Hi Rose;
  Glens post just make him look silly, he's just repeating the same thing over and over again I know I don't pay him any attention and I doubt anyone els dose. His little trick of resizing the pages is very annoying and I wish it would stop but desperate time and all. Just keep moving forward and let him dwell inn the past, no  harm done.
  Good Luck as always Pete

Good advice - thanks.  But it's Harti's encouragement of those posts that are actually worrying me.  Can't work it out.  And the most reasonable explanation is not a happy one.  I know I'm skating on thin ice in even referring to it - but it's a question that needs an answer.  We're meant to be open source.  And we're meant to be advancing OU.  What gives? 

And Pete - it's always a comfort to find you there.

Rosie

[Pirate88179]

  Hi Rose;
  Glens post just make him look silly, he's just repeating the same thing over and over again I know I don't pay him any attention and I doubt anyone els dose. His little trick of resizing the pages is very annoying and I wish it would stop but desperate time and all. Just keep moving forward and let him dwell inn the past, no  harm done.
  Good Luck as always Pete

I think most agree with this. 

Bill

[fuzzytomcat]

A prophet couldn't have done it better ....

90 pages and still not what was asked for verification of a finding of a claim of COP> INFINITY .....

This has been done in the past future here in this forum on a COP> 17 experimental device with unsubstantiated claims that were never proved "WORLD WIDE" ...


http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10407.msg285740#msg285740
_______________________________________________________________________

QUOTE -

There are hundreds of readers, members, engineers and academics that "DO NOT AGREE"  at all with your testing and evaluation of your experimental device because it's not in any scientific method known that can be reproduced to anyone's satisfaction for a verification of a COP> INFINITY .

You Rosemary, as a boasting proxy inventor that has claimed submitting many documents for engineering and academic "PEER" review, you Rosemary of all people most certainly know all the mandated requirements for a scientific verification of FACTS.

You Rosemary, are denying everyone in existence the chance to do any verification testing and evaluation on this COP> INFINITY circuit and even have posted a 100%"FALSE", fake and inaccurate circuit http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/04/109-simulated-circuit.html#links  for a WILD GOOSE chase or Chinese fire drill for anyone trying to replicate your findings by design.


MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS -

1) All COP > INFINITY device information in one place in one post not spread out over ninety (90) pages.

2) A accurate circuit diagram of the claimed COP > INFINITY device .... there are five (5) at least that I know of .... and "AGAIN" the one on your blog is incorrect (FALSE) http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2011/04/109-simulated-circuit.html#links

3) All sequenced oscilloscope screen shots and data dumps from the day of the test not days before or after for over a minimum of one hour at 6 minute intervals for a total of eleven (11) verified recordings of the COP > INFINITY device.

4) The complete parts list of all the components used to do a scientific replication to verify the results in a verifiable scientific manner of the COP > INFINITY device

5) All the settings of the Function Generator in Hz or Mhz .... including ....  the setting of the DC offset switch ( -10 VDC to + 10 VDC )

6) A complete photographic image set available for verification and review including the top and bottom of any circuit board of the COP > INFINITY device at the time under or during test .

7) A "LIVE streaming broadcast" of the device testing event in real time for 48 hours minimum untouched .... all that's required is a registering for a FREE LIVE streaming broadcast account and a web camera showing the claim of COP > INFINITY


_______________________________________________________________________



Items number one (1) through six (6) word for word was also asked by Stefan ...... WHERE IS THE REQUIRED INFORMATION ? 



Is this another COP> 17  invention of Rosemary's where 300 to 500 people over 10 years spent $300.00 in just parts for as close as possible replication ( $ 120,000.00 US ) to make try to make something work and no one could World Wide


Fuzzy



http://rosemaryainslie-publicblog.blogspot.com/   ( Great Reading )

[fuzzytomcat]

COP> 17 ...... by Rosemary Ainslie

Please find attached information that was given to the open source community on a guaranteed claim of a device with a efficiency of COP> 17 .... Rosemary Ainslie's finding and proof of that device.


http://www.free-energy.ws/pdf/quantum_october_2002.pdf   ( Quantum - October 2002   The Journal for Electronics Professionals )


_____________________________________________________________

Quantum - October 2002   The Journal for Electronics Professionals
Transient Energy enhances Energy Co-Efficients /Authors - RA Ainslie & BC Buckley
( "NO" Editorial Review )

EIT paper - IEEE 2009 AFRICON - "ELECTRO/INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE"
COUNTER ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE ENABLES OVERUNITY RESULTS IN ELECTRIC SYSTEMS
[http://www.palensky.org/africon09/]

Pretoria News - November 14, 2002
"Circuit That Defies Basic Laws of Physics"
Own Correspondent  -  Author   R A Ainslie    ( "NO" Editorial Review )

_____________________________________________________________


GOOD LUCK  !!!

No one "World Wide" was able to make a verified replication ...... 


Fuzzy


http://rosemaryainslie-publicblog.blogspot.com/      ( GREAT READING )