Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

Started by hartiberlin, February 20, 2011, 06:14:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: poynt99 on June 24, 2011, 11:54:55 AM
My later simulation results are based on a battery measurement across one of the six batteries, but all six batteries are still in the circuit, powering the circuit.
Golly.  I wonder why you had to do it this way Poynty?  Did this ELIMINATE the oscillation?  Or simply reduce it?  We're left with a couple of questions here.  If it eliminated the oscillation - WHY?  And if it reduced the oscillation - WHY?

Quote from: poynt99 on June 24, 2011, 11:54:55 AMThis was all painstakingly explained in the detailed analysis, which clearly you do not understand. Go read it please and kindly stop twisting the facts!
I'd read it gladly if you could just take the trouble to post it here.  NOT A LINK.  The actual report.  Otherwise we'll all be inclined to think that you've actually NOT written a report.  Personally I can't open your link.  I'm satisfied that many readers either can't or won't.  SO.  Let's ALL see this report if it's that germane to the argument.

Thanks
Rosemary


MrMag

rosy, rosy, you have an answer for everything don't you. I asked for a rundown test and you call me names.

Poynt has proven your circuit is under unity but now you say his circuit no longer counts. Why is it that you are the only person who has a problem opening his document?

Why are you so against this battery run down test or a closed loop test as Powercat has requested.

You keep getting caught in your own lies and just brush it off and try to put it on us.

I do have another question for you though. What were you trying to do when you discovered this circuit?

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: powercat on June 24, 2011, 11:46:44 AM

If that was the case why has no one in over two years reproduced your claim,when you make statements like that,I have to respond as you are being misleading.

Actually Cat it's you who are misleading. Plenty of replications on our previous circuit.  And even from members on this forum.  But you're right that no-one has replicated this circuit - other than on Poynty's sims.  But then you go on to say that we need to do something different?  We most certainly have something different.  This is an ENTIRELY different circuit - with ENTIRELY different results.  if you're going to object then I wonder if you couldn't just check these kind of facts first.  And like RomeroUK's circuit - ours has only been on this public forum for 3 months.

Quote from: poynt99 on June 24, 2011, 11:54:55 AMPlease do something different...
Indeed.  Again.  I'm happy to report that we have done something different.  ENTIRELY different.  And EVEN BETTER RESULTS. 

Quote from: poynt99 on June 24, 2011, 11:54:55 AMMany members have made reasonable requests that you ignore including Stefan amongst others,
but you ignore them and carry on regurgitating your same old arguments.
To the best of my recollection we've answered every single concern related to every measurement - that has ever been put to us. Grounding issues - answered.  Under sampling claims - answered.  Probe positioning concerns - answered.  Standard of measuring equipment - answered.  Impedance concerns - answered.  And since we've done this last WATER TO BOIL test - we've also answered any concerns related to out performance of battery capacity.  Remember?  We dissipate over 25 million Joules from a battery capacity that is AT THE MOST can only account for 10 million Joules.

Regards,
Rosemary

added

poynt99

Everything that's in that document was openly posted already. In fact, the document was compiled from all the posts, so you've already had ample opportunity to read the entire analysis.

I'm done for now, peace out.

.99
question everything, double check the facts, THEN decide your path...

Simple Cheap Low Power Oscillators V2.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=248
Towards Realizing the TPU V1.4: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=217
Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=209

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: poynt99 on June 24, 2011, 05:52:08 PM
Everything that's in that document was openly posted already. In fact, the document was compiled from all the posts, so you've already had ample opportunity to read the entire analysis.

I'm done for now, peace out.

.99

Poynty - if I didn't know better I'd guess that your report is that fragile that you dare not also make it easily accessible to our readers.  Of course you're done for now.  You have NO answers to the only questions that matter.  It would take you no time at all to simply post that report here.  I wonder why you don't?

Regards,
Rosemary