Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I can't tell if you agree with me or not.
Rosemary said Joules = 1 watt per second.
Wiki says Joules = Watt-seconds.
They are not the same thing.
Watts per second = watts divided by seconds.
Watt-seconds = watts times seconds
One way to make sense of the words "watts per second" is if at the beginning of a second you were consuming 1 watt.  At the beginning of the next second, you were consuming 2 watts.  That would be a change of 1 watt per second.

Bubba - watts per second is watts x seconds.  The difference between Joules and Watts is that Joules quantify the work done and Watts quantify the power needed to get that work done.  Therefore work is given in Joules - and power to perform that work is given in Watts.  Where I'm on sticky ground is the caloric value of those Joules that I computed.  This because there's an implicit relationship between 4.18 Joules required to heat 1 gram of water by one degree centigrade.  Does that relate to the time?  I just don't know. 

So.  Here's the question.  I'd be glad if you could work it out for me.  10 minutes to take the water to a steady plus/minus 66 degrees above ambient.  This temperature held for a further plus/minus 70 minutes.  Then the settings changed - and the temperature taken to plus/minus 88 degrees above ambient over another plus/minus 10 minutes.  Test period duration was 100 minutes or 1.6 hours.  Then - I stopped the experiment because I suspected I was looking at a runaway wattage on that final setting.  Bit too too nervous to let it continue higher.  I'd be glad if you could give me that number in Joules.  Be much appreciated.

Rosemary
BTW - in case this is also needed for that calculation.  It cooled down to ambient within something under 1.6 hours.  Not sure if that's significant.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

This is Wilby attacking your logic here with logical fallacies, you can safely say if your disagreeing with Rose then he is not agreeing with you.

Shortly he will ask you how much energy EXACTLY is contained in a battery, when you cannot answer him (because nobody knows) he will not say anything but will have implied that because you cannot answer that simple question everything else you say has no merit.

I expect him to change tack soon as the "energy in the battery" routine is getting old and people are catching on... maybe something like "what happened before the big bang?" would be more appropiate, or perhaps, "what did God have for breakfast last Thursday?".



RM

RM this is nonsense.  I have just dipped in on this thread and just seen this.  I can read NOTHING about anyone attacking anything in Bubba's or Wilby's posts.  We're all asking questions and finding answers.  Can you please try and  keep your gratuitous and unsolicited and inappropriate comments off this thread.  It would be appreciated.

[powercat]

Attack anyone that disagrees with you 
Ignore all reasonable requests to do new tests 
Keep claiming OU regardless of the fact that no one here can reproduce those results 
If they think your circuit doesn't work or you made a measurement error, they are in a conspiracy 
Ignore all the requests and keep using this forum as an advert for your work 

This is not going to go away, this forum is not your blog, stop ignoring reasonable requests from members here.

You will pick on small detail and not address the main point, and you will also repeat what you said before ( this is not your blog) please interact with the reasonable requests made by members here for you to do new tests.

You can't tell me of any member on this forum that has produced OU with your circuit, because nobody has.

Here are few videos for members on the forum, they are other members that didn't make videos who also failed in their attempts to match your claim of OU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrwgEb5ac_w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZM8BBa7_Zpc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4x0wQJrc9To
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-GBS3sKcB8g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trip8gjoxMQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpaP__5Kd38

Do something different Here on This forum,and stop ignoring reasonable requests for tests. or stop claiming OU on This OverUnity Forum.

A big conspiracy, it would appear that anyone that says your circut doesn't workor or indicate's measuring error, is then part of that conspiracy.
Many members have made reasonable requests that you ignore including Stefan,Mr Mag amongst others,but you ignore them and carry on regurgitating your same old arguments.

Go on Rosie proof that 99 is wrong in his analysis and makes something that runs and runs and put it on the Internet after all,
(Quote from Rosemary)
"All one needs are the the measurements and some reasonable account of the apparatus that produces those measurements".

The fact still remains that no one here can reproduce your claims of OU, and you are not willing to do anything to change that deadlock, apart from use this forum as your soapbox and blog.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Cat.  I must thank you for the critical excesses in your posts.  It generates a flood of emails and I am then reminded how supportive are the most of our readers here to our hard work.

You 'trolls' never learn.    It really is true.  All publicity is good publicity.  LOL.



Kindest regards,
Rosie


added
Actually I'm beginning to realise that the KISS OF DEATH to this work of ours would be to get support from the likes of you.  You guys hopelessly underestimate the intelligence of our readers.  It's really rather insulting. 

[MrMag]

Hi Cat.  I must thank you for the critical excesses in your posts.  It generates a flood of emails and I am then reminded how supportive are the most of our readers here to our hard work.

You 'trolls' never learn.    It really is true.  All publicity is good publicity.  LOL.



Kindest regards,
Rosie


added
Actually I'm beginning to realise that the KISS OF DEATH to this work of ours would be to get support from the likes of you.  You guys hopelessly underestimate the intelligence of our readers.  It's really rather insulting.

That's great to hear rose. We can keep on posting until we get enough people here that maybe you will actually do the simple test I requested.