Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8

Started by Feynman, March 22, 2011, 04:07:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

JouleSeeker

Quote from: Mavendex on August 15, 2011, 07:44:22 AM
I think I got a total of 6 volts by putting a wrapped pipe in a rodin coil vortex, The rodin coil was being juiced by 1400 watts. Like I said the rodin coil is weak it needs alot more flux.

Mav -- I'm having trouble visualizing this -- could you show a photo or drawing of your "rodin coil" and your "wrapped pipe"?  would like to understand, and I appreciate your "hands-on" experimental approach.
Steve

Mavendex

Quote from: JouleSeeker on August 17, 2011, 01:07:33 PM
Mav -- I'm having trouble visualizing this -- could you show a photo or drawing of your "rodin coil" and your "wrapped pipe"?  would like to understand, and I appreciate your "hands-on" experimental approach.
Steve

Hope

Russell's theory like Ed Leeds worked as did Tesla's.  Ed's greatest clue left behind SHOWS or leads us to the conclusion that he had knowledge beyond normal science.  Obviously he meant to leave the message "How did I do this" within any that pondered his work.  Tesla showed us his results and wanted to share it all.  William Russell could see and convey his insights thru exacting art displays.  These three figures inspire many to persevere and not be thwarted in our endeavors.   They all had knowledge of similar kind, a knowledge which is intentionally suppressed still today.  But it is not hidden.  They all had achieved a working knowledge of physical science (physics) and what we commonly label as the spiritual now days to them was even more than an unseen being.   They knew it was this unseen side that had connection to every part of our world.  There is a unseen balancing action to every movement in time and space.  We should remember ALWAYS to include the balancing action in devising our designs.  Tesla the builder, Ed the builder, Russell the conveyer all had powers beyond our contemporary science models because they we willing to fail as many times as it took to learn what was the balancing forces and how to master them.   We will all do better if we seek this science and take courage in failure as a step up the ladder of knowledge.  Not just "it doesn't work"  but say to ourselves "what part failed and why"   We know how to use current but do we know how to use magnetism,  attraction, repulsion, heat, contraction?  Nature does and will every time for us if we do not incoporate it into our designs.  What purpose did Tesla have for the antenna besides gaining energy.  It was NOT the energy to power the vehicle it was the energy to complete the cycle of balance which was the secret we still today are missing.  What did Ed collect from magnets pointing away from his device.  Did he collect unseen content,  did his iron mass (engine) store this contents so he only had to filter it SLOWLY to use its discharge?

See thinking of circuits, there are many variations but balanced cycles there are few.  Yet nature shows us how if we but slow down a bit and observe its ways. 

Ed's coils and air capacitors may have been a way to just release selectively the forces he captured from the back side of his wheel.  Is magnetic current or flow the other side of electrical current?  Electrical is the expansive force and magnetic the contraction?  How can we use this knowledge to enhance our designs, our storage or energy, even our definition of energy? 

Please take the time to read and ponder this link:  http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/2010/11/more-on-inconvenient-truths.html#comment-form

Mavendex

Triple Core Transformer mmmmmmm so much awesome is hard to contain I already broke it twice.

Hope

Mavendex please do not close loop ANY OU device without going through a regulator.   The cascade avalanche will destroy the device so quickly it can't be stopped.   Why would Permalloy shell be better?  If we saturate it and the inner core, won't the Permalloy act like the inner core and keep lots of the field?  Does anyone know if those shiny rock shaped magnets will work in the secondary core.  Crushing them is OUT.  They are way to hard to even break one with a 5 foot 60 lbs iron bar.  I looked like that dwarf in Lord of the Rings trying to break the ring with his axe hammer.   LOL 

But I can make a magnetic ring of these rock magnets and seal them in resin. ??? Any ideas on this??  Should we try a camelot ring minus one magnet?  This will create an imbalance which spins into a magnetic vortex naturally.   Dave what do you think about this idea.  Anyone else that has tried this let us know ahead of time on your results please.