Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8

Started by Feynman, March 22, 2011, 04:07:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

SchubertReijiMaigo

RE:
It look like I have some good news...
Test was with amplifier, at 24 Volts input.
Observation:
1) It seems the output power depend directly of the input current...
2) The secondary current seems to be constant at all load...
3) The best result was when I don't saturate the inner, (inner was at more or less 1 Tesla)...
4) Two test was made: one with 100 Hz and another with 250 Hz...
5) At 100 Hz the output the bulb more brighter than input bulb.
6) At 250 Hz the input bulb was off but the output was gloomy.
7) If I up frequency the output become darker.
8 ) It seems to have an asymmetric, unproportional current between input and output...
9) Traditional transformer windings ratio doesn't work here, 12V 100 turns will not turns into 24V 200 turns for example !!!

Hypothesis:

1) I think is better to not saturate the inner.
2) To increase output with no input, I think to wind more turns at secondary OR
3) The FE effect is not related to Heins effect but rather a phase difference between primary and secondary, more the shell is thick more you have phase difference, at 90° you can put any load you want the input will remain zero..
4) OR both phenomena described above...

Now Photos !!!

Mavendex

We have a Winner!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Now get some magnet wire, wrap your toroid till it fills the cavity, pull off x amount of amps and then in series pull out all the volts, then step it down.

In the bigger device 50 volts will = a amp or so in that range, not sure about your smaller guy there. As you can see tho you can get 1000's of volts with more turns on the secondary draw a couple of amps and then your in the realm of hoora!.

Good Job, I knew you guys could doit.
Mav



Magluvin

Quote from: SchubertReijiMaigo on August 23, 2011, 10:59:31 AM

3) The FE effect is not related to Heins effect but rather a phase difference between primary and secondary, more the shell is thick more you have phase difference, at 90° you can put any load you want the input will remain zero..
4) OR both phenomena described above...




Tesla wrote about this phase shift in his pat.   ;]

Mags

Mavendex

Unfortunatly... it took 120 years for everyone else to catch on ;)

and wouldn't have even come to surface if well you know :P

broli

Quote from: SchubertReijiMaigo on August 22, 2011, 10:21:00 AM
More test still needed and I plan to buy True RMS watts meter because measuring with light bulbs is not very accurate (you don't see if input is reactive or working current)...

Unless a true rms watt meter isn't that expensive you ought to get a nice DSO. They are much more versatile and useful in the long run. The cheapest multi channel DSO's is this one...

http://www.ebay.com/itm/4-Channel-ARM-DSO203-Nano-Pocket-Digital-Oscilloscope-/250830077865?pt=BI_Oscilloscopes&hash=item3a66a33fa9