The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8

[Mavendex]

Has anyone tried primary windings using same method as Tesla used in his patent 381970, System of electrical distribution ? Divide primary into four quadrants and put 'positive wave' through two opposing quadrants and 'negative wave' through other two. This way Tesla added rotation in the magnetic field.

You would need to use two diodes to separate current in two parts.

You can find the patent from here (search for 381970): http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter5.pdf
If someone is not familiar with this site then it is worth checking out, ABC of free energy stuff. You should read also Chapter3.pdf, about solid state systems.

I have not tried this but a geometrically wound primary will move the field around as well, I may try this since I have some days of down time.
although speaking from personal experience, trying to geometrically wind a primary with 9 gauge is rather difficult, not impossible but difficult.

[Jack Noskills]

Do you have diodes you can use ? The hot line should be divided in two parts if I understood the patent correctly. Basicly you split hotline in two, upper part has diode opposing then coil after it, lower part has coil and after it diode in passing direction. Then these two are combined again. This way current from left goes via lower path and current from right goes via upper part.
Also the windings should be such that they form S-N S-N S-N S-N around toroid. And if there is no effect do it like I do when I have no clue (which is usually the case), reverse the order of the wires lol.

[Mavendex]

I don't have any diodes but radioshack I would hope has some otherwise there is Mouser

If I don't see a change with the Geometry ill give that Tesla deal a go, but from experience going from helical to a geometric shape tends to change up the phase angle, and increase power out. Its just really difficult to do with the shell vs. the nanoperm core.

Tons of stuff out there that is untouched or overlooked the universe is in fact a playground for the curious.

Mav

[AmericanMan31]

Yea! "DIFFICULT"...sheesh, I just got through winding 70 ft of 14 gauge onto a 3 1/2 inch nanoperm for my Bismuth shell.  Note: For all of you trying the bismuth route make sure you let the molten bismuth cool just ABOVE solidification point --otherwise you'll end up with no Bismuth sticking to the clay barrier! (very frusterating) my last gabbys' secondary windings were "fried" because I didnt cover them with a clay barrier. oops.  Live and learn.

@ Mavendex:    Question.. How far should the outer shell be seperated from eachother?  I have a gabby that is close to ~ 4" wide I dunno if that helps, but I would really appreciate feedback, thanks Mavendex

[Mavendex]

I'm still working on this big shell I had made, tried a few other things like cutting up Transformer Lamination's to create a shell, Lots of sharp edges but lays right on top of the windings and is much closer to the nanocore. but again my primary turns were so overworked I had shorts and could not get to a point of drawing any power.

Before they shorted I can tell you that the voltage gain was far superior to the shell I have made, but again I could not draw power off so I wouldn't know if they were supported or not, my guess is a good majority of the volts would have been supported due to being right next to the primary shell which is the case for the steel shell I had made.

The closer those windings are to the shell the better support your gonna get.

Mav