Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8

Started by Feynman, March 22, 2011, 04:07:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.

Magluvin

Still working on the outer shells of the tube style as I have time to gitter dun.
Inner core feels very attractive. Got pics Ill put up this week

Been thinking, considering the classical flux analysis pdf, there may be another way of using toroids.  2.

1 inner and 1 larger in diameter. The larger dia should be maybe thinner  or less attractive than the inner core as to not attract the sec field.  If we have a really attractive inner core, there should not be much escape for the sec field.  Im assuming with the right spacing between the inner and outer core, the primary(outer,thinner core) field will easily cut the sec core windings, but the sec should remain attached to the inner core and not bother the primary.

This is something I can accomplish with less work its taking to produce the straight cores the way Im doing it.  Im planning a 3in od inner core and a wire primary core.

If this works, cooling will be a breeze.  ;] And changes can be done to either core without a complete tear down to rewind the inner core.  ;]   I have a good feeling about this.

I know car audio amps mostly use toroid transformers in their power supplies, and mostly not shielded. So is there much of anything radiating from the core(transformer) while pulling 50 amps from the 12v battery?  Let alone 10 amps or 2. 

There may be a possibility of a need for a thin shield between the cores, and it would probably allow for closer proximity between the cores. Still an easier try and test process. ;]

Mags

Magluvin

Oh, also, I have seen some pics and vids of a primary wound around the outside of e core transformers. I dont know if it works but I imagine the need to have some separation of sec and pri on the sides that the inner(sec) winding is exposed. Shielding? Some of the perm sheets?

But this is how the tube style should work also.  The E transformer would be an easy experiment.  ;]

The sec field stays within the core, thus not cutting the primary.  Hopefully my tube style will work as I imagine.

Hope

Mags, you can order nano perm sheets at $10 a pop at Goldmine Electronics.  Look in the "Magnets" section.

Magluvin

Hey Hope

I saw them. The site has some neat stuff.  And at that price, everyone should have a sheet. ;]

Has anyone ever seen an E core transformer, that has a band of copper around the outside of the transformer, in the same direction as the windings, then soldered where it meets to create 1 big fat shorted outside winding?   

Well I have. As I spoke of in a previous post, that I have seen people winding wire around in a similar fashion as a primary winding. So what can we learn from this?

So what is the function of the copper strap?  To kill high freq from the magnetically exposed sides of the transformer?

Is the copper strap, being in close proximity to the exposed winding sides, taking power from the transformer as a shorted single turn secondary winding? Or is it just stopping radio waves because of freq involved? 

Even though, I find it intriguing if the strap doesnt pull a LOT of power, if any, from the transformer as waist. Or does it?  If not, then it seems like a shield, if winding a primary around the outside of the transformer, may not be needed.  ;]


So maybe winding around the outside of the transformer has some merit. The transformers I have seen with straps are in pc power supplies and other supplies. I cant imagine that anyone would consider the strap for power losses. Not purposefully anyway.  Hmmm   lol

Its possible that if a surge were to be encountered through the transformer, that possibly the surge, if it saturates the core, will be absorbed by strappy, and not get to the vital stuff avoiding damage.

Mags

Hope

Been checking on devices with 180 degree coils phasing with each other.  This is one of the things Stan Meyers did also. And Mr T too along with Ed Leeds thoughts on all magnets can be polarized like light.  Then there is W Russell saying gravity is 90 degree in opposition to matter.  So if we can try something like this we may find out why they liked it as well.