The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8

[Mavendex]

The way I see it, its 1 innercore + 1 innercoil + 2 Shell halves + 1 outercoil = 5

but its just a guess I would think Mags has the true answer that each turn is magnetic field ect ect ....

Im really liking the super cap btw, the amperage from the cap won't flow back in to the transformer cause if you wind it down with some fine wire to make voltage as high as possible, A. the resistance would be too great and it would go to the path of least resistance, and B. when a person winds the inner core like that then nothing will come back out the primary effectively making the output of the secondary core nothing more than a frequency + voltage and the load can take its needs from the supercap.

Intriguing Idea after I get this one finished definitely going to test voltage potential between the two shells and the shell halves them selves could potentially have two supercaps each attached to each shell mmmmmmmm this is getting really fun and off the rails at the same time.

6 volts + 1 Farad = 1 amp

[Jack Noskills]

ok, goof stuff Mav. Here is something more to ponder about with caps in case they are not already in your todo list,

Connect shell halves with one cap, then take two outputs and put caps in series there. I think resonance would have an effect here but could be difficult to find, so testing with different size of caps could be usefull. Anyway when putting caps in series big caps are needed when using low frequency signal.
Short the secondary and get power through those caps instead. Shorting will give high current and thus high magnetic field, maybe this has a positive effect.

If you have function generator, what happens if frequency of input is increased to lets say 1 khz. I know Eddy currents will heat the core, but if Eddy's are now sucked out will this still be the case ? Higher frequency would also mean lower capacity caps would be needed.

Shooting in the dark as usual but when you shoot long enough you are bound to hit something. Atleast the foot anyway.

[Mavendex]

shooting in the dark is fun, the supercap is a great idea, especially when your siphoning a loss and making it in to a gain in more ways that one, its one of those win win win scenarios, not only are you creating the necessary amperage for your load via eddys, but when you do that you diminish the eddys which lessens the skin effect that they produce in the shell making the magnetic field well up and provide more energies to the secondary, at the same time heat will be diminished, and last but deffinitly not least since the load is taking its amps from the cap and not the secondary one would expect that the transformer would act as it would while being unloaded because the secondary is supplying the voltage/frequency only and the amps come via cap which is taking away the losses which make the transformer more efficient power factor would be in the .07 range so everything that your using to create the energy is going back to the source and fountains of energy are coming out the backend.

This is a very very very good idea and I commend you on it!

In a way its like making a all new type of energy and would effectively be called Direct AC

[AmericanMan31]

[Those shell halves must be separated and if they accidentially touch there will be arc ? I recall something like that was mentioned earlier.

What happens if you connect two wires directly from the shell to a load, lets say CFL ? Is there any power ? What happens in primary/secondary in this case, does COP change ? If there is no effect then howabout putting two caps in series, one in each output wire and connect those in a load ?]

Thats EXACTLY what I want to know too, Jack.
...Why wouldnt we be able to power a load?

[Hope]

Here is some coil  information (general type) for all to use, it should help anyone winding or in resonance seeking (planning).

http://www.mhw-intl.com/assets/CSC/CSC%20Design%20Formulas%202011.pdf