Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8

Started by Feynman, March 22, 2011, 04:07:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Magluvin

I cut open an old ign coil from the 60s to see core materials and coils. 
For the size of the can, there isnt that much in there. More oil than anything.

But one thing that I found interesting, was 2 half round sleeves against the inner walls of the can, with an thin insulating tube to isolate the coils from the can.
But the 2 sleeves are arranged so that the 2 halves have a gap(bout 1/8 in) at the edges to not touch eachother,  sure to avoid eddy currents, just like the shells being isolated.
These sleeves are thin and bent amateurishly with kinks and flat spots as if done with a hammer on a 2 by 2 wood block. not sure of the material makeup.

What is interesting is, we can assume that the 2 halves, are 2 halves, to avoid eddy losses. But what about the can? Are these thin sleeves(2 thick on each side) enough to contain the working fields from getting to the can, where eddy losses will surely be because the can is continuous.

The core is thin laminated iron, I think.  :o   Who knows.

So effectively the sleeves complete the outer core of the transformer in the can.

So this shows that the Gabriel device can be made using straight cores and tube shells split down the middle as I had envisioned earlier to make the builds easier.

I was not happy with home made cores with epoxy. The density is no where near what can be had from  a manufacturer.

Ill post some pics of the core materials and sleeves(shells)tomorrow.

Mags

Mavendex

Your right, that it can be done with lower perm cores but not too low I tried using a iron powder core and it didn't get anywhere near the nanoperm, perm of the iron core was 68, but I have a 8000 perm nanocore that did just fine, I would think that silicon steel having a perm of around 2000 would do better considering it can also achieve a High Tesla rating in to the 2 tesla range further increaseing your reactance, and cheaper too boot where a nanocore costs 200+ a silicon steel core would probably be 50 bucks plus you can probably peice one together out of old transformers that they just take to the bone yard.

instead of air use a dielectric that is also magnetic , I personally use JB Kwik on this and so far so good on that, this keeps the magnetic connection electrically isolates the shells and the shells themself develop a very high voltage, do not try to take energy off the shells directly cause it will cause a breakdown of the dielectric and you will have to re jb kwick which is A. messy, B. Stinky, C. a royal pain in the arse. Plus when you seal in your gaps with the JB kwick you seal off any air flow creating a pseudo vacume which is also a very good dilectric. the combination of both makes for good outcomes.

and for a added bonus you can get a nanopowder of strontium titanate and dope the epoxy with that which will further increase the dielectric constant.

By having a high voltage in the shells this will inturn hold up your secondary voltage so your not trading volts for amps. so far I have enough data to prove this fact.

Mav

Mavendex

So after I posted last I had a apiphany or how ever you spell it, I had a test a few days ago where I was getting some really funky results IE when I put my volt meter leads on my nanoperm leads I only had 1 volt lead to 1 lead of the nanoperm and was getting voltage out of the air from the other lead.... now I know it sounds crazy but I also have a hole on the bottom of my shell and hole on the top of my shell which would create a partial vacuum at the center of the shell.
Described here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venturi_effect
Now im gonna give that test another go here over the weekend after I replace my JB weld and put a couple of straws in the holes and see if I can get the same results evidently in we can pull electromagnetic energy from the vacuum which is new to me but Im also only a 2 year student of the phenomenon and I have no back ground in EE but getting better
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy
So thats our source or added bonus of energy cause of the change in pressure thats what we get.
Mav

Mavendex

I did a quick test to confirm the theory and yes it is infact the case, a very easy way to go from 0 to 1 power factor, going thru with a battery of tests to see if we can increase output with a little formula of dielectric and some secret sauce plus vacuum.

all is good and well on our way if it all works out after this build we should have a very cheap to build device.

This will be a nice 2.0 build major changes in play and much more simplified

Team America Eff Ya!!
Mav

e2matrix

Still following along... Sounds like an interesting find Mav.   Best of luck on this.