The Gabriel Device, possible COP=8

[forest]

.

[e2matrix]

Just another tidbit:
"US Patent Office Holds Secret Approximately 4000 Patents
 
Tom Valone is a former Patent Examiner who was fired about six years ago for producing a conference in Washington DC on these new energy technologies. Valone recently won a lawsuit against the US Patent Office and was awarded reinstatement and six years of back pay. In a 2001 email to Gary Vesperman, Valone wrote in part:
 
"As a former Patent Examiner, I can tell you that the number of "secretized" patents in the vault at the Patent Office (Park 5 Bldg.) is closer to 4000 or more. They never receive a patent number, and the inventor is rarely, if ever, compensated by the government for use of the invention."
 
The U.S. Patent Office has a nine-member committee that screens patents for national security implications. A hidden purpose of this committee is to also screen energy-related patents which could threaten the power and fossil fuel companies, etc.
 
Text of Generic Patent Secrecy Order
 
SECRECY ORDER (Title 35, United States Code (1952), sections 181-188)
 
NOTICE: To the applicant above named, his heirs, and any and all of his assignees, attorneys and agents, hereinafter designated principals:
 
You are hereby notified that your application as above identified has been found to contain subject matter, the unauthorized disclosure of which might be detrimental to the national security, and you are ordered in nowise to publish or disclose the invention or any material information with respect thereto, including hitherto unpublished details of the subject matter of said application, in any way to any person not cognizant of the invention prior to the date of the order, including any employee of the principals, but to keep the same secret except by written consent first obtained of the Commissioner of Patents, under the penalties of 35 U.S.C. (1952) 182, 186.
 
Any other application already filed or hereafter filed which contains any significant part of the subject matter of the above identified application falls within the scope of this order. If such other application does not stand under a security order, it and the common subject matter should be brought to the attention of the Security Group, Licensing and Review, Patent Office.
 
If, prior to the issuance of the secrecy order, any significant part of the subject matter has been revealed to any person, the principals shall promptly inform such person of the secrecy order and the penalties for improper disclosure. However, if such part of the subject matter was disclosed to any person in a foreign country or foreign national in the U.S., the principals shall not inform such person of the secrecy order, but instead shall promptly furnish to the Commissioner of Patents the following information to the extent not already furnished: date of disclosure; name and address of the disclosee; identification of such part; and any authorization by a U.S. government agency to export such part. If the subject matter is included in any foreign patent application, or patent, this should be identified. The principals shall comply with any related instructions of the Commissioner.
 
This order should not be construed in any way to mean that the Government has adopted or contemplates adoption of the alleged invention disclosed in this application; nor is it any indication of the value of such invention.
 
(The punishment for a violation of this secrecy order, should an inventor exploits or even simply discusses his or her invention which is classified by a patent secrecy order, is 20 years in federal prison. The unlucky inventor would then lose everything he had invested in his invention.) "

[e2matrix]

Here is the Panacea University article I couldn't find a minute ago.  Excellent read of what has happened with so many OU inventions and inventors:
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/howtheywentwrong.htm

[importfanatik]

Could we keep the patent / legal talk out of this discussion thead?
It is completely moot when you consider the effect this phenomenon will have on our world (both good and bad) if it is proven to exist.

Mav has been generous by openly sharing his knowledge, and we are working on proving or disproving the concept by way of replication, and that is all that is relevant.
Lets keep the focus on research, information sharing.
Lets keep it in one thread.

Does anyone have pictures of a successful replication?
Im Looking forward to seeing how everyone else is comming along 

[wayne49s]

I think Panacea University has an article (but I couldn't find it at the moment) about how NOT to go about getting an invention out into real world use or how not to have the world get the opportunity to see it and use it.  It's a good read.  You might also be aware of the US Patent office SAWS program.  Document attached and very pertinent info.  IMO patents are only good for multi-million dollar corporations.  It's very expensive to defend a patent and once it's patented all the big boys become aware of it and will use it with mods.  Then you have to face serious expense to defend it and you are required to defend it.  I know it's a rough decision to make.  If you are sure you can make money up front with investors and a patent go for it but so many have tried before and it's nearly always a losing deal for the inventor especially on any free energy related device.  Best of luck however you go about it.

The attached document is very interesting. It explains why so many free energy devices have been stopped in the US. It is really incredible how the government and established powers work together against the interest of the common people.

I looked at the patent definition from wiki, and although I've never seen a private person being sued for tinkering on an patent, apparently a patent disallows anyone from making or using such a device without permission:
"
The exclusive right granted to a patentee in most countries is the right to prevent others from making, using, selling, or distributing the patented invention without permission.[1]
"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent

I can see there's a lot of responsibility and stake on Mav's shoulder.

/Wayne