Investing money in free energy: Rule of thumb!

[Pirate88179]

The Pirate asks to share - that made me laugh - no offense it is just funny irony

I am new here, I have been watching for a year or so, and I agree with my other friend.

I also stood before a grant committee with 5 Engineers, two brainiac s and a team of managers who "with the complete designs and explanation, engineering modeling, and proof - stood there with only one thing to say - it just can't work, it just cant, it just cant - too many people have tried, it must be a scam (Such faith!).

Anyway - I wil share - I love to shae, this has been a great adventure!

but as I said earlier - not on this thread.

I need a thread that is titled "Diffirential pressure exchange device" or something.


I will see what I can do, there are pictures on my web site - if you can keep from gaging 

I am reasonably intelligent yet I guess I missed the irony.  You owe no explanation yet I am curious.  I have shared everything I have ever developed here, but, it was because of the other smart folks here that enabled me to do so.

Bill

[mrwayne]

Cool, I figured out how to add a heading to the thread in water/ wave capture.

I posted a very simple explanation, it is late, I will check back tommorrow.

Well, the irony was "Pirate" - which means to copy and steal - was asking to be trusted with open content.

Kind a like - let me hold your wallet......I am a pirate.

If I were the worrying type - that would scare me...

[Pirate88179]

OK, I guess I get it.  I suppose this means that you do not really know me and my history on here.  That is fine.  It is understandable.

Bill

[e2matrix]

mrwayne,  I'm going to say I believe you have an overunity invention.  I looked at your web site and just from intuition I've learned to trust I think you are being honest and have some 'thing' that is overunity.  However from what I see I think there is one rather large concern.  Maybe you can address it.  From the pictures the unit looks like it is quite large and from that I expect it will be fairly expensive just for materials to build.  Yet that very large unit states it generates only 500 watts of power.  So the biggest problem I think you have may not be proving overunity but proving this can be affordable and competitive even in the long run.  I may be wrong if this can be scaled up so a slightly larger unit could produce 100k watts.  But from what I see you would need a large room in a house just to have one with enough power for an average home.  Based on what I'm seeing I would guess a solar/wind system with battery bank would be cheaper. 

[mrwayne]

Thanks Ematirx,

I was very upset about the size - the Grant committie insisted on the size, they wanted 40 watts of free energy for proof.

It also worked well to have only one weld per sheet of metal - we had to build it all.

And there is 5 layers inside each tank.

The cost to upsize is very small, in fact the equipment that you see hooked to the system is sized for a 40kw system.

Since the design uses compressed buoyancy, 11/1 compression, doubling the initial size means adding 10 inches to the diameter. and then multiply the output by 11.

So adding 10 inches to the diameter changes the system from 500 watts to 11,000 watts - and so on.

My personal opinion is this ROI, the  100kw system cost about $150,000 to build including the generator.

My engineer has modeled up to 500kw

And at .10 cents a kWh - the machine will make about $100,000 Worth of electricity.

Depending how much the mark up is, it can pay for itself pretty quickly.

Thanks for the support!