What You think about use of new, ecological nuclear power against Fukushima,

[Doctor No]

I think that You are completely right. In time oil peak, when all energetic values are more precious as gold, it was needed to get rid of one of its consumers. The better candidate was China, but it is easier to organize among own mob. Had You forgotten 9.11?

[forest]

I have stupid idea.

I have been learned that all chemical reactions are reversible, why decay reaction cannot be reversed ? 

[Doctor No]

For good question, You have answer. Yes, really, it can. But You need a big tachyons cannon. Or engine. Tachyons (free gratitons) timing particles really are. So with proper use of them, you can change speed of each processs. Such as we do for cure. But for cleaning such big atomic shit, big device is needed. When Amis really wanted to do sthg good, they could fly over this Nippon-mother-fuckers-shit with one of his big "Ufo" vechicles. But i know them.  They don^t do it for sure. So we drop a bomb. It is cheaper. 

[mscoffman]

I have stupid idea.

I have been learned that all chemical reactions are reversible, why decay reaction cannot be reversed ? 

@forest,

Generally speaking they are and you are correct.
All, but CP parity violating operations that I know
little about. But it's a little like thermodynamics all
going one direction. You can't necessarily get all the
reactants together in one spot at exactly the correct
times - so you are stuck with those fusion operations
that are physically feasible to perform.

:S:MarkSCoffman

[Doctor No]

I assure You once more my Friend, that dropping 1 MT clean antimatter bomb, with no side, long term, effects is the best way against atomic shit. I^ve first proposed it 40y. ago already and was astounded why Soviets had not done it in Tschernobyl. Simply they did^t knew the technology for it in this time, as Amis already had, and nobody said. Even today. The world is very strange, trust me.