Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[mrwayne]

MrWayne, Excuse me... Asking why the ZED stalled in 4 hours does not reflect what you are willing to discuss.

This is an essential information, from now no one should waste his time or money trying to replicate your device without you giving this information. You are entertaining dozen of fans in this thread with hope of OU, they deserve an answer.

You probably have arrived to the point where yourself after years and lot of $ spent have realized that there is no OU in your machine, just something that last hours a bit like the long pendulum of the London science museum.

I read that the additional layers increase the global efficiency from 104% to 300% from where come the additional 196% from the outside layers?? I dont understand all of the ZED as you have figure.

You have top scientists and engineers (read one hundred) that advise you. What means "top", they must have figure long ago what is the physics behind the ZED, a ZED is not rocket science; Archimede force, some simple fluid mechanics, a first year university student in physics or engineering should be able in a 2 weeks project to put on the table the physics involved and say yes or no if there is OU in a ZED. I cannot imagine that after years and $ you dont have this physics formula in your hands, if you dont show us, it is easy to figure why ...

It was so simple to tell us what was the problem to keep credibility something like "look guys, it stall because water leaks at one valve and water pressure drop fast" then we have an explanation (true or wrong) for your first failed demonstration that does not comprise the claimed OU.

Desapointed

Hello P.
I have only five minutes - so let me answer first questions, and then respond to the statements that are not accurate.
I am here to help those willing to put effort into understanding the system - not to have anyone validate our system.
We are very confident in the second Part, and convinced of the capability of those trying.
Second - We have brilliant people helping, visiting and checking us out on a regular basis - and to Date - only one - who refused to show ID and Refused to agree to certain respects - has been turned away.
Yes they number over 100 - yes many are very educated and skilled.
Yes we have extremely respected people for the Validation process.
Finally - I quote the very conservative efficiency - very conservative.
Actually, I have shown how and why - it was ignored after four pages of shirt ripping by some.
I am disappointed that the answers to your questions - such as we ran four hours tops till we broke the machine - three times and then rebuilt it stronger and now work to get the system up and running is translated by you into "stall" not OU, and disappointing - do you think we are not kicking but here to give you what you think you deserve - a fully functioning running machine.?
Lastly - over five minute rats - Our OU is not and has not been the question - simple phisics can show it  over and over - turning it into a fully functioning system is a chore. We did not build thesystem originally to be anything more than a input output measurable system - it still is - but now we are adding fully functionability to the complete system - I hope you can see where your suppositions are disappointing.
Sincerely - excited and happy to share - just stay on focus.
Rome was not built in a day.
Wayne

[johnny874]

Well, I have not been to secret, and so I do not confuse myself, I need to explain a few things about my invention.

It uses multiple channels of water to transfer energy to the same number of air pockets, each air pocket is sandwiched between two pistons, the layered pistons apply a direct upward force on a hydraulic cylinder.

Each channel of water increases the "Head" and thus increases the pressure in the air pocket - to be clear each air pocket has a different amount of air pressure increasing in succession.

Since the greater pressure is in the lowest, each piston has a greater force than the one above it.

Now, this upward action of this set up is not much different than the same action you would get from a pneumatic cylinder.

10 psi on a 1000 inch (squared) piston will roughly lift 10,000 pounds - so will my design.

The main difference between my system and that cylinder is the down stroke, after the load is removed, the input is allowed to vent, my design keeps that exaust  pressure at exactly half of the input.

In our photo's you will see two Z.E.D.s that is because we use the exhaust pressure from on side to supply half the fuel for the other.

You can guess the net gain...

More tommorrow, it is late.

mr.wayne@hydroenergyrevolution.com

www.mrwaynesbrain.com

   Mr. Wayne,
Thanks to pirate88719 and TinselKoala, now know that what you claim to be as The Travis Effect is nothing
more than Heron's Fountain.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heron's_fountain

                                                                                                      Bye

edited to add; the first chamber has 14 psi of air pressure acting on it. Simply means it uses hydraulic theory to increase the water's pressure with each successive chamber. Sound familiar ?
And to think, the biggest complaint people have against me is people like AB Hammer and his friends don't like me. But Alan always did say he should have any invention that comes out of this forum because he has a family to feed. I thought that's what his armoring was for but have found working openly only allows opportunity for clever people.
Think I will take my money, you know, patent my invention which will work but is not very interesting.
Well, anyway, I hope you have a nice day.

[mrwayne]

   Mr. Wayne,
Thanks to pirate88719 and TinselKoala, now know that what you claim to be as The Travis Effect is nothing
more than Heron's Fountain.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heron's_fountain

                                                                                                      Bye

Sure - thank you.
I will add you to the list.
Good bye.
Wayne

[johnny874]

Sure - thank you.
I will add you to the list.
Good bye.
Wayne

  came back so I could delete it. to late I guess. Still, for the crap I've taken for no reason, just have to wonder.....

[fletcher]

Sincerely - excited and happy to share - just stay on focus.

Rome was not built in a day.

Wayne

But it burnt down in a night.

LOL - sorry Wayne - couldn't resist the windfall moment to drop in a one liner 


Sincerely, good luck to you & the replicators with the build projects - I am looking forward to the results.


Final dignified acceptance of new physics understanding that would shake the foundation of the world is a series of often hard won, sometimes feral, skirmishes for intellectual real estate, fought for in every laboratory & garage, one at a time - until there is no more high ground to take & flags to teardown, & hearts & minds to defeat.