Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[mrwayne]

163 pages and still not one joule of overunity energy... All somewhat tedious.

Just a few thoughts on the latest discussions.

1. Precharge...  It is present at the start and end of the cycle so it can contribute nothing to the net output. It is not relevant or necessary to include it in the analysis.

2. Take long hard look at the graph of displacement vs input head as shown in #2417. A purely linear result. Somewhat different to the many claims of a non- linear process occurring as expoused by mr wayne some time ago.

This machine doesn't work.. get over it and move on.

Should Mr Travis continue to claim this invention does produces usable energy he should be investigated for fraud. He will by now have realised it does not work but does not admit it.

LOL, thank you Seamus 01-02-03 you just made me chuckle again - your pompousness has become a point of conjecture.
Thanks I needed the smile - Oh - now you incite investigation - lol -
Well the validation team will do fine. ;-)
Follow the dots, understand the whole system - ours produces usable free work - lots of free work...
p.s. our optimized system is over 600% efficient - which you will never respect - So have a nice day other wise.
Wayne

[powercat]

Hello Seamus,

Legally Mr Travis can claim whatever he likes, since you or nobody else came up with a technical counter argument that disproved his claim conclusively.  When it comes to a public test system, he can take whatever time he wants and he stated already what his plans are in that respect that are in progress.

Anyone that comes to the attention of this forum making a claim of overunity
must be investigated and that is the purpose of this forum.

Some people believe in blind faith, I'm sorry but in all the years of being here
I have heard and seen it all before.

What I haven't seen before is a selfrunner that can be replicated by anyone with basic skills,
or even anyone with advanced skills.

Now Wayne is claiming that he has such a device and that it produces overunity.
So it is going to get challenged you should accept this and move on.

[powercat]

LOL, thank you Seamus 01-02-03 you just made me chuckle again - your pompousness has become a point of conjecture.
Thanks I needed the smile - Oh - now you incite investigation - lol -
We'll the validation team will do fine. ;-)
Follow the Dot's understand the whole system - ours produces usable free work - lots of free work...
p.s. our optimized system is over 600% efficient - which you will never respect - So have a nice day other wise.
Wayne

I'm glad you're finding it so entertaining that people are getting frustrated about your broken promises,
and you're serious lack of overwhelming evidence that you do have a real overunity device.
I hope you have because the world really needs it and the world needs it now,or haven't you noticed
the environmental disaster that is unfolding.

No doubt you will be coming up with more excuses just like we've seen in your previous history.

[neptune]

@Webby1. If what you say is true, and you have never lied to me before, your TBZED has little if anything in common with a spring assisted bollard.

[mrwayne]

I'm glad you're finding it so entertaining that people are getting frustrated about your broken promises,
and you're serious lack of overwhelming evidence that you do have a real overunity device.
I hope you have because the world really needs it and the world needs it now,or haven't you noticed
the environmental disaster that is unfolding.

No doubt you will be coming up with more excuses just like we've seen in your previous history.

I am in a really good mood, God has blessed us.
I would hold your position if our claim of OU were not based on input reduction versus excess from nothing, yet I would not stand for ignorant treatment of the messengers.

Our testing is going so well - we are all so excited here - so forgive me if I was insensitive to your "frustrations", my mistake.

Being disconnected to the action here (at our lab) leaves you at a disadvantage - I am sorry - I share what is safe. If you go read some of the threats of theft leveled by some of the "challengers" in this thread - you might understand better.

A big mistake made here over and over by Challengers"  is the mistaken notion that they have a right to tell me what I can do and have to do - Sorry about that too - not the way it is..

I am willing and have shared here with those that are trying to learn - it does not relinquish my right to give and share what I choose.

I don't want to appear presumptuous - but you defend "opinions" "conjecture" and "slander" as if they are legitimate "challenges" - if you think that way - I disagree with you.

Challenge me on the facts presented -with facts. If it is our discovery you are after to understand.

If you are out to determine if we will be the team to break the assumed OU barrier - that is not why I am here - history will take care of that - don't rush it, be patient. Thank you.

If it is "understanding" our hard work... you are after - questions with facts - (the ones that have been authorized for releases).

What we have released - does not represent all of our learned and applied technology - but clearly enough to determine if we have an anomaly - OU or something worth persuing.

Many on this thread have done just that and reported here - which are summarily ignored - and you want me to respect those like Seamus 01-02-03? Just saying it can't be done is looking through concrete glasses. EOS

Finally - in more ways than one:

It will all begin in a short time - the validation is just around the corner - I am relieved and excited (myself and so is or team).

p.s.
Broken promises? - it is trash like that that makes Seamus not worth reading -  get real - Research and development takes time - it has been worth the work - from 160% efficient to 600% - I guess that the results are pretty well worth pot shots taking insults like that.

Did Edison run and claim victory on the first wire he made glow? No.

We have one solid shot at this validation with the right people - we have labored - under great testing and expense to make sure their effort is respected - tough for you - the way we respect those who don't wear concrete eyeglasses.
Take care and be sharing soon.

Wayne Travis