Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[johnny874]

Yes, please Jim.  You are making a lot of false and slanderous statements.  I am not sure if you just do not understand or have some malicious intent.  But your conduct is becoming less and less professional and respectful.  Please try and reread the patent and try to fully understand the principle.  Nothing in Mr Wayne's Zed is moving due to pressure in closed vessels like a classical hydraulic or pneumatic cylinder.  The motion is in an open top system and happens due to buoyancy.  It is buoyancy that is being utilized in a unique configuration.

M.

   M.,
Nothing false about the guy who invented the intermittent wiper making $30 million.
Wayne claimed that large companies gobbled it up.
And here is a link to the USPTO web site and provisional patents. You'll find I have
researched this before which is why I know about it and what it requires. I learned for myself, so if Wayne wishes to say the USPTO is wrong, he can.

http://www.uspto.gov/patents/resources/types/provapp.jsp

[mrwayne]

  Wayne,
You have intentionally misrepresented yourself in this forum. That is plain wrong !!!
To wit, you have a provissional patent. This is not to be confused with an actual patent.
What are the differences ? Namely a provisional patent requires no examination which you claim to
have been subjected to. Seriously, lying like that is not good. Would you like me to show you the post ?
A provisional patent costs $110 and is given just for paying the application fee and submitting a 2 page form.
The purpose of a provisional patent is to help inventors who might wish to market their invention while having
the protection of a PROVISIONAL patent. It requires no patent search, examination or any demonstration of
being an actual invention. The inventor(s) is given 1 year from I believe the filing date to convert the provisional
patent to an actual patent which would require going through the complete patent application process which you
claim to have done. Shame on you !
If your device works as claimed, after initial operation, disconnect the battery. That is the only proof you need
and yet have failed to post a video showing that your invention generates enough electricity to power itself.
And any excuse you make (baseless claim) will mean you want something. What was it you posted ? With a patent
and being able to generate sufficient power to have a new and valuable source of energy would make you quite rich.
edited; not quite rich, you would be thanking God for the great things you are doing  ;edited
Who knows, maybe your ego and greed interfered with good judgement.
Still, prove me wrong and disconnect the battery. A simple request.

(Correction) - Johhny, you have move from negativity to attack.
We filed the Provisional in Nov 2010, the conversion to a full patent in Nov 2011, and the PCT.
I have the Letters from the patent office and Numbers - you might be confused?
Lets be clear on one point - I may make a spelling error - or mix up a number - or use the wrong symbol
But you have just accused me of lying - Untrue -
I have spent nearly $40,000 for the very best Patent searches - Provisional patent, Conversion, and PCT.
Please be careful with your charges.
I understand a mistake has been made here on your account, your joy in the charge is dissapointing.
Stefan - please handle this.
Wayne

[johnny874]

Larry, you have move from negativity to attack.
We filed the Provisional in Nov 2010, the conversion to a full patent in Nov 2011, and the PCT.
I have the Letters from the patent office and Numbers - you might be confused?
Lets be clear on one point - I may make a spelling error - or mix up a number - or use the wrong symbol
But you have just accused me of lying - Untrue -
I have spent nearly $40,000 for the very best Patent searches - Provisional patent, Conversion, and PCT.
Please be careful with your charges.
I understand a mistake has been made here on your account, your joy in the charge is dissapointing.
Stefan - please handle this.
Wayne

  Wayne,
Saying that you're protecting your investment because you don't want to be ripped off like the guy who invented the intermittent wipers is not a typing error.
And >>  I have spent nearly $40,000 for the very best Patent searches <<
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/qs/ope/fee092611.htm#search
Unfortunately, the USPTO charge fees for doing the search. Doubt you could spend $40,000. Anyone can check the link. $620.00 is the highest search fee they charge and that is for a utility search fee which is probably what you would have needed.
  When I have tried to discuss engineering with you, your only answer has been that I do not understand. Yet you won't disconnect the battery which you claim is only used to operate the air pump when you initialize your invention. And this suggests that it is what's responsible for what you claim to be an overunity device.

                                                                    Jim

[mrwayne]

  Wayne,
Saying that you're protecting your investment because you don't want to be ripped off like the guy who invented the intermittent wipers is not a typing error.
And >>  I have spent nearly $40,000 for the very best Patent searches <<
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/qs/ope/fee092611.htm#search
Unfortunately, the USPTO charge fees for doing the search. Doubt you could spend $40,000. Anyone can check the link. $620.00 is the highest search fee they charge and that is for a utility search fee which is probably what you would have needed.
  When I have tried to discuss engineering with you, your only answer has been that I do not understand. Yet you won't disconnect the battery which you claim is only used to operate the air pump when you initialize your invention. And this suggests that it is what's responsible for what you claim to be an overunity device.

                                                                    Jim

Johnny,
Our patent attorneys are top notch.
The Battery question has been answered.
You decided the intermitten windshied wiper guy was robbed of money - that is not my focus.
The point of his battle was not the money - but that a scoundrel back by big bucks - claimed they invented it. Did you watch the show?

I have spent to much time - trying to show you respect - as you continue to disrespect our work.
And you are still in my prayers, for your health, the surgery, the Job, and your heart.
Good Day.
Wayne

[johnny874]

Johnny,
Our patent attorneys are top notch.
The Battery question has been answered.
You decided the intermitten windshied wiper guy was robbed of money - that is not my focus.
Did you watch the show?

I have spent to much time - trying to show you respect - as you continue to disrespect our work.
And you are still in my prayers, for your health, the surgery, the Job, and your heart.
Good Day.
Wayne

  Wayne,
I did watch the movie. That is why I wondered about a lot he did.
I have let Stefan know that I am hoping by this weekend to have a demonstration of what Bessler knew 300 years ago. I think it is something everyone will understand.
Simply put, it will be straight forward and will not need an explanation. This si why one critic of Bessler's said it was so simple, a child could build it. He was ridiculing Bessler for being successful.
About the intermittent windshield wiper guy, you are the one who said big companies gobbled it up, I showed your post. I said he made $30 million.
I think this is why we can't be friends. 
>>  The point of his battle was not the money - but that a scoundrel back by big bucks - claimed they invented it.  <<
It was about money. Either that or he was a control freak who wanted to play King Midas or something. After all, he wanted Ford to supply him with the funds to manufacture it and then sell it back to them at his price. That is what he wanted, that kind of control.
This is what I like about Bessler's wheel, I think it's a cool part of history.
And this is why I hope once I demonstrate how he did it that you stay out of it.

                                                                       Jim