Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

Started by mrwayne, April 10, 2011, 04:07:24 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 164 Guests are viewing this topic.



Red_Sunset

Quote from: TinselKoala on November 02, 2012, 05:20:34 PM
Bait-and-switch.
TinselKoala.
I agree with Xaverius, "How is that".  I didn't know Wayne was obligated to you. I would expect a happy reaction
I would think that it is a natural evolution for a good inventive idea. Simplification and increasing efficiency are key important for any product. The reason why the physical implementation is secondary to the invention principle.

TinselKoala

Quote from: Xaverius on November 02, 2012, 05:23:24 PM
How's that?
The unit Mark Dansie videoed is not the Zed in current production. The unit detailed in the animation on the MrWaynesBrain website is not the Zed in production. The simple, threelayer system that is clearly overunity by itself is not the Zed in production. The unit shown in the photo slide show is not the Zed in production. None of these systems is what is going to be shown this weekend. The investors, whoever they are, were told about things like the simple three layer system that is clearly overunity by itself... but that's not what they are getting, is it.

Bait, and switch. WHERE is the simple, three-layer system that is clearly overunity by itself (MrWayne's exact words), which was cited and used to drum up the early interest in this system? Where is the demonstration of self-running, for more than four hours, of ANY of the various different OU systems of Mister Wayne?

Bait, and switch. Show a picture of something, get up the interest, and then remove that first something completely without actually showing it, ever.... and promise a new, better something.... soon. Bait and switch.

That's how. Get it now? Mylow, Archer Quinn, Steorn, Rossi, the list goes on and on. Every one said they had something, and when challenged they refused to show that working something, instead saying that better somethings were just about to be revealed.... on and on, over and over for years, some of them. If Mister Wayne doesn't want to be included on this list, he probably should stop acting like all those who _are_ on this list.

TinselKoala

Quote from: Red_Sunset on November 02, 2012, 05:47:04 PM
TinselKoala.
I agree with Xaverius, "How is that".  I didn't know Wayne was obligated to you. I would expect a happy reaction
I would think that it is a natural evolution for a good inventive idea. Simplification and increasing efficiency are key important for any product. The reason why the physical implementation is secondary to the invention principle.

If Mister Wayne makes claims of overunity performance, new energy  sources,  in this forum YES, he is obligated to provide evidence that his claims are true. This is not a church!
If he doesn't choose to provide evidence that his claims are true, why is he even making them? There are several reasons that come to mind. On the other hand, if he DOES have what he claims, I cannot think of any reason whatsoever, considering his participation here (which seems to have ended) that he would not immediately provide the necessary proofs. Which, by the way, could easily be done without revealing any proprietary information.