Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[LarryC]

I've set up the simplest example of a single ZED. A Pod and 1 Riser and included aditional information of the formulas used and a drawing of the setup. The math is simple and should be easy for anybody to understand.

The Travis lift force advantage over a hydraulic cylinder is shown in green at bottom. Can anyone show why the logic used to get that result is wrong?

And 'I don't believe in OU' or 'My physics understanding states that is impossible' is not acceptable, show your proof.

The Excel data set is included at the bottom. On mine you need to move the right slide bar down to see it.

Regards, Larry

[Red_Sunset]

Red:  Thanks for this link...that book is great!  I am about half-way through and it is incredible to see how the "scientists that we have all come to know and love have fudged results now and then to make the experiment fit their theory.  Then, someone else builds on their work and it turns out they were right but, not exactly right.  Fascinating.Bill  ...............................................

Hi Bill,
I am happy you are getting the same enjoyment out of the text than I did. 
Our Science repertoire is clearly made up of building block that get stacked on top of each other over centuries.  We build the next block on top of the previous, sometimes in a direct way, sometimes in a curved wacky way.  Wayne unwittingly discovered one of those major building blocks that expands our ability to build where we couldn't build before. Mark my words, history will prove them right!

Some good quotes,
Max Planck quote:  "A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."
Isaac Newton quote:  If I have seen a little further, it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants." (not by hiding behind)

This might also be of interest ,
The Breakthrough Energy Movement Conference:    http://globalbem.com/
The first conference is being held on November 9, 10, 11 in Hilversum Holland.  A world class program which will cover breakthrough technologies and their world-changing implications. A journey into the past, present and future of our energy landscape. With over 18 speakers, two conference rooms and a 3 day program, this event is designed to focus on the full scope of Breakthrough Energy Technologies.
The program :  http://globalbem.com/conference/program/

[Red_Sunset]

The situation exists today in another way.  The "accepted" science of today in astronomy is that our earth wobbles causing the precession of the equinoxes.  However, the math does not work.  The scientists keep coming up with fudge factors and convoluted theories to explain why they need yet another fudge factor.  While the obvious answer that is simple and mathematically consistent is that our solar system is bound to SiriusA/B+ as a binary system with a 24,000 year orbit.  All the observational data for many thousands of years, and the precise scientific data of the last 20 years points to this. 
http://www.viewzone.com/sirius.html
I am a firm believer in the scientific method, but it appears that quite a few scientists only believe in it when it conveniently agrees with their learned prejudices or desired outcome.  I lost confidence in what the scientific community says years ago.  They say or prove whatever will bring in more funding to their projects.  Today, I have to consider the motivations of the scientists and where their funding comes from to help "interpret" their conclusions.  In other words, I take everything with a grain of salt.
I am very keen to proceed on this thread with an unbiased assessment of real data and how a ZED works, and leave all the conclusions out of it until the data is all in.  Believers, non-believers, and undecided should not matter to analyzing data.
~Dennis 

Hi Dennis,
Seeing that video clip that describes our earth in double level reference frame (solar system/binairy star system), made me think about Wayne's invention in the context of a single reference frame with a variable influence between the two domains.
Your simulation will shed a better light on the workings and understanding of the Zed and the capabilities it makes available towards OU.  Good luck and looking forward to a interesting outcome

[minnie]

Hi,
    just a couple of points,I used to control my borehole pump with air over water and it doesn't work out,every few days it would
need re-pressurising. By using a diaphragm made it reliable.
   If one were to build a machine on the lines of the animation on H.E.R. shown at the moment I'm sure it would need a hefty motor
to keep the thing just circulating,with all those rams sliding and all that small bore tubing the losses would be tremendous.
                                    John.

[ramset]

TK
Times are Ruff ....
Is your invite still good at the water park?

I got two pails a gas and a box a puppy chow? {perhaps a slightly used T bone too??[like I said times are Ruff]]

?

Chet