Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[mrwayne]

 deleted

[Red_Sunset]

deleted 

Thanks Wayne for pulling the plug,  I am glad this idiotic circus is over !
Looking forward to some serious work with like minded people

[TinselKoala]

maybe that is why he has my email addy.

I don't think, what I measured showed, just because you did not like my method which was quick, crude and only gave end results.

After all you still seem to think that we have to PUSH the risers back down, not even with my sticky sink do I need to push them and I still get fluid out under pressure.

Where did you ever get that idea? The weight you lift, pushes the riser back down in conjunction to the "suck" you produce by lowering your input vessel below "zero", does it not?
Or can you do what Mond can't, and take your weight off the top and still get a sink? I don't think so.
But I never said you need to add any force to push your risers back down. If I did.... please show me where.

And that's true of the automatic bollard, as well, in contradiction to Mister Wayne's interpretation.
I see from Mister Wayne's reference to the Automatic Bollard that he doesn't understand that simple device, either.
On the way up you have to pull up with three pounds of force. This is like adding a little buoyancy to a non-floating object that is just on the edge of floating. On the way down, it feels like it weighs three pounds, and sinks of its own accord. This is because you've now taken away the added "buoyancy" of your three pounds upwards force.  If you tie a string to it, you can have it pull something by the string on the way down. This is the effect of the "precharge" in its internal compression spring, which effect can be described, as I showed, in exactly the same words Mister Wayne uses to "compute" his 960 percent figure.

So once again, you 1) accuse me of saying or claiming something I never said, and 2) you refuse to correctly interpret or absorb the lesson of the automatic bollard.

And you are soooo sensitive about your choice of materials. But you got two thousand dollars! It would have been a small thing for you to take a fifth of that money and buy yourself some proper materials to work with.
Did I ever say, by the way, that I didn't "like" your method? I like it very much, in fact, and I thought I made that clear. It supports my contentions about Mister Wayne and his claims rather admirably, but could do so even better if it was built out of actual tubing instead of what you used.

[TinselKoala]

Thanks Wayne for pulling the plug,  I am glad this idiotic circus is over !
Looking forward to some serious work with like minded people

Care to make a small side bet, Red? I'll wager you one frozen pepperoni pizza and a bottle of Mogen David 20-20 that Mister Wayne will not demonstrate a self-running machine that has no input and makes usable output power and runs for 24 hours, before January 1, 2013.

If you lose, we can "double down" and extend the bet to Valentine's Day.

[TinselKoala]

Goodbye TK.
Larry will be sending invitations to our known support team members to our private forum. 
@ others - You may request an invitation by email.
Thank you Larry for the organization. Wayne Travis
President
HydroEnergy Revolution LLC
mr.wayne@hydroenergyrevolution.com

Thank you for not lying to us Mister Wayne.  Your refusal to answer my three simple questions with a "yes" answer can only mean this: You do not now have an actual working system that runs of itself with no input making usable output power, you never have had a working system that made 10 kW output with no input, and you do not have validation teams measuring anything they like right now at this moment.
Bye now. I'm sure we'll be reading about your salvation of mankind in the papers..... soon.