Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[mrwayne]

Wayne, if your present system works, the one in the video, without supplied external power.... then you don't need to "guide" anyone.
Provide what I suggested: engineering drawings, the electrical schematic, the hydraulic circuit, the pneumatic valvology, from the existing, working prototype, not the patent. Or, if you like, invite some interested impartial third party (like me) to examine and test your working prototype. I can tell you this: if it is self powered, truly, and uses gravity and buoyancy to sustain operation.... I can set you up solid, my man, solid. I'll get rich from being the middleman, but you will get hugely so rich you cannot imagine it, and the world will be a better place very quickly.

That is great, I really appreciate it.
Mark Dansie has assembled the team for our Extended runs - critical review and then (assuming of course) the team to prepare our scientific presentation.
He has seen our system running last November, and had full access to our engineering.
Now that we (following his advice) installed the Data collection system and generator to the system - it is time for the follow up - should be about June 28. (I am leaving end of next week to go to a 50th anniversary party)
We do have our working model - actually since May last year, Mark has guided us very carefully - what "extraordinary proof means".
So we are not rushing ahead - doing it right - after the pct cleared - I decided to let the group know where we are.
We are not setting up Middle men - but we never know who will actually become part of the team - so if you are just tongue in check making the offer - no worries.
If you would like to be in the group coming for our final review - let me know, I will bounce it off Mark and make a decision.
Once again - Thank you for the professionalism.
Wayne Travis

[johnny874]

How much will it cost to become a part of your group ?

[Lakes]

If tk evaluates this and says it works, I want to buy shares in your company!! lol

[neptune]

In the light of newer information, I have had to re evaluate the feasibility of building a model of this device . The problems are as follows .
1 Owing to very poor eyesight , and very limited computer skills ,I am unable to gain much info from the patent.
2 The patent shows a design that works by moving air. It is since discovered that moving water is more efficient, but no revised diagrams are available .
3 To gain reasonable efficiency, fairly close tolerances are needed. So no building from empty baked bean tins.
4 The idea of building from fibreglass and waxed paper was an excellent one . But who is going to risk the investment in time and materials without having concrete info on proportions and dimensions. Trial and error methods could take years, and then costs mount up . Who would invest hundreds of man hours without knowing that there is an excellent chance of success.
5 I am unsure of mrwayne`s motivation in encouraging us to build a model . Maybe he hopes that we will discover new ways to make this better. I do not have a problem with that. However , there is a far greater incentive he could contribute  to model building than his $2,000. Of far greater use would be much more info , especially in the form of diagrams, dimensions and proportions . Forget about hydraulics. All we need for now is how to get two ZEDs working . From there it is just conventional engineering.


I would guess with the possible exception of Mondrasek, nobody really understands tis enough to attempt a build.

[Lakes]

I agree. more details required to build a scaled down desktop model.

The whole point of having a working model is to show less clever people like me how it works!

Someone posted a youtube link to a animation of a similar idea, an animation of the way wayne`s device works (same arrangement as in the patent drawing) would be a start.

At the moment all I have is a vague idea of stacked nested containers filled with tubes linking each one.