Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[mondrasek]

@iflewmyown,

Here is the big picture:  Free electricity from ZED stations power desalinization plants and pumps.  We can now irrigate all the farm land we need.  Free electricity from ZED stations electrolysize water into Hydrogen and Oxygen.  Free electricity from ZED stations compress and cool that Hydrogen into liquid.  The liquid Hydrogen replaces any need for oil as a fuel, though it will still be used for all those other chemical products it is now.

Pure electricity from ZED stations will be able to power many of today's devices that currently use gas and diesel from oil.  This includes most cars.  But the technology does not yet exist, and maybe never will, to provide enough electricity from batteries (or other storage devices) to power a tractor trailer.  Or to power a jet plane.  But Hydrogen can do that.  Heck, you can put a man on the moon with Hydrogen.  And the only byproduct is water, not Carbon Monoxide.

I'd not invest in any oil jacks long term if I were you.

M.

[iflewmyown]

MrWayne: I know the pump jacks are on the way out. I have an old diesel Bobcat loader. It works great as long as you give it a shot of ether to start. The pump jack replacement was just a shot of ether for your operation. The New York Times refused to interview the Wright brothers for five years after they first flew. All their experts told the Times that it was impossible to fly. In the same way free energy will start very slow, no matter what the benefits, no matter how cheap energy becomes and the oilagarchy will be the last to know. Good Luck and God Speed.
Garry

[mondrasek]

@iflewmyown, just me here, not Mr. Wayne.  Thanks for the analogies.  Especially those about the Wright Bros.  I actually live in the area of their research.  Where I work is within viewing distance of the hanger with the model Wright B Flier that the local air club built and flies.  It's pretty neat for me anyways, especially since as a kid I vacationed at Kitty Hawk and got to see the museum and their full sized model.  The family and I are actually scheduled to head to the Outer Banks later this year for our vacation.  It will be my first time in many, many years.  But I want to see the Wright Bros. museum there again!

I think the differences between the situation with the Wright Bros. not being taken seriously and the ZED are paramount.  At the time of the Wright Bros. flight the "technology" of a curved wing producing lift had not been established and taught in schools.  With the ZED we are playing with known and taught phenomenon.  It is just a clever construction that allows the known physics to do something previously thought/taught to be not possible.

Also, at the time of the Wright Bros. flights we did not have the media to cover such events that we have now.  The editors at the New York Times could not watch a video on the internet, see the e-mail comments of scientist who have reviewed the patent and math, or "fly" (ha!) to go see it for themselves.  All that is now reality.  So I expect a faster uptake of this development.  Hopefully.

Any production facility making anything is competing with others.  Any advantage is extremely important.  And every product has some associated "energy" cost included.  Any way to lower that energy cost will be adopted fast.  And only the fastest will survive, IMHO.

Here is the link to Mr. Wayne's last update to his web site before heading off to the 50th anniversary he is attending:  http://hydroenergyrevolution.com/index.php/current-objectives

Cheers,

M.

[LarryC]

@M,
Agree that we should use the spreadsheet that most helps each to understand, but since I still am using the original, here are some update.

@All,
The fields in yellow, at the top can be changed and is used in the calculations for the rest of the spreadsheet.
This will help in model design. There are two versions, one for the Square shape and one for the Cylinder shape.
This is still the 4 Riser version, Wayne recommended that we build the 6 Riser version. The efficiency of the 4 Riser is 183% and the 6 Riser is 316%. At this point, I find that would be very difficult, but if someone can handle it, please do. If you need, I'll be glad to make a 6 Riser spreadsheets.

I stopped at Lowes today, they will cut the acrylic pieces for you or you can buy their scoring tool.
It seems simple to use, just clamp down a straight edge on top of the acrylic, score, then move it to the edge of the table and snap off.

The 1/8 inch is cheaper, but 1/4 inch thickness acrylic would probably be required for the container to maintain the glue holding ability on the corners.

Regards, Larry

[mondrasek]

@LarryC,

Well done!  And I agree totally that making a square version lends itself to changing the gaps between each outlying Riser and it's annulus walls much easier. 

Hopefully we will see a model build soon.

BTW, are you going to build?

M.