Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[mondrasek]

Update on design of the 6" OD clear acrylic ZED model:

Changed the outer tube back from 3/18" to 1/8" thick, since this works better once a preload weight is added.  Added a 2.2 lb weight (in calcs only) to the Outer Riser to load to approximately 1/3 of the "ideal" buoyancy potential, as far as I understand it.

I removed water from a fully stroked ideal setup until the Pod and Inner Riser were about neutral buoyant.  The volume of water removed was 5.748 in^3.  At this point the Outer Riser was still slightly buoyant so I removed water from the outer ring until it too was neutral buoyant.  I went back and drew the initial "Full" condition with this slightly reduced water volume and redid the calculations.  Now my system is preloaded to just slightly more than 1/3 of it's full buoyant lift potential, but I believe we are well within tolerance limits.

If my understanding is correct, removing the 5.748 in^3 of water should put this single ZED model at it's equivalent "free flow pressure?"  If so, removing 2 x 5.748 in^3 will define the amount of water that needs to be exchanged (with half a pump system) in order to define the system stroke?  I'm still trying to decide whether I have convinced myself of this or not.  Everyone's thoughts are appreciated.

M.

[neptune]

OK. It is Tuesday night. If everything goes according to plan, we can expect Mark Dansie to start his tests on Thursday. They say that patience is a virtue. But with a forthcoming event that is potentially much more important than the first man on the moon, waiting is not easy. I know that Mark is there to check that it works, and not to prove how it works. I seem to remember that Mark will spend a couple of days testing , but I am not certain. No doubt he will need time to get back home and write his report. I just hope that he will not make us wait too long before saying what he has to say. I know that Marks report is just the beginning, but it is a very important step. Personally I find it very exiting.

[johnny874]

   Neptune,
You are jokimg, right ?
  edit wayne run it for two days, it is a simple test. just have faith,

[mrwayne]

OK. It is Tuesday night. If everything goes according to plan, we can expect Mark Dansie to start his tests on Thursday. They say that patience is a virtue. But with a forthcoming event that is potentially much more important than the first man on the moon, waiting is not easy. I know that Mark is there to check that it works, and not to prove how it works. I seem to remember that Mark will spend a couple of days testing , but I am not certain. No doubt he will need time to get back home and write his report. I just hope that he will not make us wait too long before saying what he has to say. I know that Marks report is just the beginning, but it is a very important step. Personally I find it very exiting.

I am excited to  - Mark will come as soon as I ask - he is ready too.
But I have not asked him to come yet, I might after tommorrows Run.

As Mark wisely says - it will be when it will be, do not rush this moment. - one of the mistakes inventors make - rush in and blow the one good chance (we will not blow it).
Now I send a Report each step of the way - and here is the one I just sent:
Hello Men, Very good day.
After replacing the last suspect leaking check valve - and the pressure loss remained - we pulled the lid off the Zed and found the leak was from the fitting under the lid inside the top of the Zed. - repaired and are leak free  at last!
Matthew reversed the operation of his water level adjustment calculator - and gave us the low position based on our end of stroke data (high position)
This is where the water level should be at the start of a cycle / so now we have both.
We set it up, ran it and verified the accuracy.
We also verified the production strength  :-) we are GOOD!
In short - we gained 750 pounds lift per inch - above the internal input cost.........
Everything is working great -
In the morning we will be fine tuning the water level (minor changes) and running the system.
I have one manageable set back - we only need 1.375 si cylinder for the lever arm assist - (the internal input) and we have the options of 1.0si and 2.0si
Running 2.0si is a big waste - still over unity - but overkill the input -
I used to be able to move the location of the cylinders - but not since we mounted it horizontally.
Another option is lowering the output - by lowering the operating range - with less weight. - but that lowers our output too.
The third option is to adjust the system to use all 2.0si - that puts us dangerously close to blowing skirts.
I will have to make a decision,
Thanks for your support.
Wayne Travis
President
HydroEnergy Revolution LLC
mr.wayne@hydroenergyrevolution.com

[neptune]

Hi Seamus. Of course energy is added at every stroke. It comes from the output. This is called LOOPING.


Energy density increases as you scale up, in a non-linear fashion. How ever low the energy density is, it is still a WHITE CROW. The energy density of the present machine is higher than all the Hot Fusion devices ever built at a cost of Billions of dollars. It is indeed possible that white crows are the only type we will see, soon, as all the black ones will have been eaten by academics.