Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[conradelektro]

 Wayne, I wish you well and hope you succeed in what ever you want to achieve. It is great that you built this impressive machine.


But I want to repeat what I said (over and over again): As a mentally sane person one can not believe in something that is not disclosed in every detail.

Since you do not want to disclose every detail, what is there to discuss besides "philosophy", "insinuations" or "metaphors"?

I do not want to be rude, but one can say it in short: "If you want to disclose, speak up! If you want to keep a secret, shut up!"


I also want to state again my opinion, why OU is the worst possible choice for money making:

If ever we find OU, it will be a new source of energy or a new way of transforming one kind of energy into an other kind of energy. In other words, it will be a new law of nature not yet discovered.

Once this is discovered, there will be millions of ways to use that principle and it will take decades till something really useful comes out of it. The "discoverer" (who may see himself as an "inventor") will not be believed for a long time. Mainstream science and public opinion have a high inertia which needs first of all "time" to be overcome.

You can not patent a law of nature (or a principle), only a way of using that law by help of a contraption. And there will be endless ways of implementing a principle. There will be thousands of patents.

It is by no means assured that the discoverer of a new law of nature will get credit for his discovery. Clever business men will come out with it with a new name and a new spin. Mainstream scientists will present it in their own words and claim fame. Hundreds of people will claim that they have found it before you. Many will sell books about it.


So, for me nothing has changed, nothing remains to be said. Once you are prepared to disclose, I will be back. Till then, good luck.

Greetings, Conrad
(One can read in detail what I said on pages 1 to 3 of this thread.)

[vrstud]

Hello Wayne:

I believe that you are taking advantage of the change in surface area which in turn is using surface tension to your advantage.  Clever idea.  Doing so causes the water to expand energy to create more surface tension in order to do work.

Are you taking water temperature measurements?  If so, do you see a cooling effect on the water over time?  This could be the source of your energy.

Regards

Chris

[hartiberlin]

Hi Wayne ,
it would be great if you could do another video explaining just your start process
and explaining in detail your power output and how you measure it and how the generator
is connected to the system.

You could do it this way, that you don´t give away the secret inside the machine, but show to everyone,
how you get the power out there and what kind of bulbs you power there above the power meter...etc.,..

Just do a good narration in the video so the whole machine gets more clearer also to people who are no
engineers and have zero technical knowledge.


Just imagine tell somebody, who never heard about this yet the facts about this machine and what it can do and
how you want to scale it up...


By the way, scaling it up into the KiloWatts range will be probably pretty hard with the current design,
as this is only outputting about 30 Watts for this size ?
So how big do you have to do it for to get at least 1000 Watts out ?

Or does this scale up with the used air pressure inside ?
Can you get still more power out of it with the same size, if you build the
components more robust, so it can withstand higher pressures ?

Can you please also show in a next video the 2 red bulbs you are using there ?
Are they really rated at 15 Watts each ?

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

[sidneo]

Hi Wayne ,
I have one question if i may .what happen when if you replace the molded cement in the youtube video with another recipient full of water ? does it have the same buoyancy as the simple recipient full of air all the way up?

I am asking this question because as silly as it sound its what seems to be implied in the video other wise the
"travis effect" will be hardly mechanically usefull unless there is somethink else than what as been showed in the video.

[markdansie]

I wanted to clarify some things.
I think this is a good exercise for Wayne being reviewed and this is just a taste of what he will have to go through when third party validation takes place. (the money people are a tough crowd) It is however hard to have a sensible argument or a full review when a lot of the information is missing, and while the technology is under development that has to be the way it is.
I have seen the device run in person in what I call manual mode. Over the last few months Wayne and his team have been working to fully automate it and gather data to assist in the new design.
I have not signed off on it and publicly stated this many times until I can see it run non stop for at least two days with no inputs.
However I am optimistic about this being achieved, especially seeing some of the data and discussions with his engineers.
The next hurdle once this is achieved it increasing the power outputs.
I am very happy you all asked the questions and many are valid, but on the other hand its difficult for Wayne to answer with his hands tied behind his back by not being able to disclose too much.
Once I have seen it run for two days non stop I will report back (with Wayne s permission)
Kind Regards to you all
Mark