Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[WilbyInebriated]

At this stage I'll just reference the non specific cases.

LOL!   

I already know that the basis of the calculations used depend on the laws of conservation.  Using them to analyse a Zed system (or any system) cannot possibly lead to anything that shows an overunity result. That should be self evident to you or I'd predict you know a whole lot less about FEM than it being "very familiar"

more "predictions"?   LMFAO 

Since MrWayne alludes to some magical 'non linear process' occurring somewhere in the machine, I'd say it it up to him or his engineers to model that it in a way that is consistent with the observed results.
However, being a software engineer and trained in mechanical engineering myself,  I'd happily provide some code if I could be convinced the effect was real and able to be modelled. Nothing shown so far passes that test for me.

and does your modeling software include ALL the parameters that reality includes? will you provide the list of your parameters for peer review? ohh wait, that's all a moot point isn't it... because there is no way to convince you the effect is real.    so... why are you even bothering to blubber on about things you aren't going to do?


i see the troll milelow is back again... doing nothing but telling everyone else how it's done...

[mondrasek]

Hello all,
My wife and I have just returned from Wayne Travis' shop in Oklahoma...

Thanks for your update! 

Too bad about the NDA.  Not the fact that you signed one (I would too), but just that you can't tell all!  Good for you!

Now please add anything more you can reveal.  Technical or not.  It's all very interesting to those who live in "flyover States" that are much further away.  And at least one from Queen's land is on the edge of his seat...

M.

[mondrasek]

@MileHigh, welcome back!  I can't remember anyone asking you to leave but I, for one, am happy to see you return.  Your type of critical thinking fills a gap here, I believe.

I've noticed a pattern in Mr. Wayne's responses that I thought I might address to you.  It appears to me that he does not answer some questions purposely.  At first I thought it was because he may have overlooked them in the thread posts.  And that may still be true.  But I wonder if he does not respond to questions that would involve disclosure of information that has not already been made public in the patent and videos?  I believe he might not be addressing questions that may be considered IP that is not legally secured.

M.

[mrwayne]

 
Hello All,
When I was a young manager I was in charge of all the MIT's (Managers in Training).

One particular "Corporate" transferred MIT - was transferred  to me - so that corporate could decide if his problem surrounding his last location were personal issues with his other trainer (no they did not tell me of his issues).

And since his issues were of his own doing - they arose very quickly - he made grievous errors continually - he put no effort in to changing his skill or efforts - because he had become a master of deceit - and he felt very safe in his ability to divert responsibility - lie - and to always have some counter charge - or teary eyed excuse about something.

He was not improving - and he was not trying to - and as the lead trainer for OKC this was a nightmare.

I was pretty frustrated - like many of you are - here on this web site - dealing with what you call "Trolls" they can say anything - and back up nothing - they don't try - they don't need to - they can switch at any point to a new position - as you futilely try to defend or hold them accountable to the last lie.

So, back to the MIT-  I was livid with this MIT - my supervisor Danny Cruze - come by and asked me about the MIT's progress - boy did I have a load to get off my chest - after I vented - Danny said -

"Wayne, the MIT is not the problem - you are............. You are in charge and you have given your efforts and energy to a game of tennis........he said go look in the mirror and ask what you can do differently that will change the outcome - not what you can make others do."

It was not good advise to my ears at that age - I was PO'ed - dealing with a liar - cheat - and I was frustrated and tired with the effort I was extending proving the falsehood's - over and over.

Danny called and asked a week later - "Did you take that look in the mirror" .................I wanted to tell Danny something rude - but he was such a Good man and wise - I bit my tongue and then said - "OK Danny - I will"

So feeling like a fool - I stood at the mirror - and asked what could I change about me - to change the situation.
I really wanted to win the tennis match - really wanted to win - how could I change my behaviour - set up traps? cameras? detailed log books, duct tape and beatings --lol

Danny called again - "are you still playing tennis with the MIT?"
I said "No"  ....not because I had solved the problem - but because it was the right answer at the time - and instantaneously - I realized that was the answer -
The only way to defeat a liar - a deceiver - an obstructionist - is to not give them the game.

Do not step on the court - the lies are just diversions - the truth is all that matters - if you chase the deceptions - you run back and forth expending much time and energy - and you gain nothing but a record of a new lie.

But when you step off the court - and hold your true position - you are in charge of yourself - and the liar.

So the Next Lie the MIT told - I stopped him mid sentence - and said - "fix it now" - he countered with "but I did it already".... "do it now" .... "I have witnesses" .......  Do it now.......I do not care what when how or who - your job is to do this work - do it now or quit.

I tell you all this story because it is happening again here.

All you have to do to let Seamus, Mark Euthanasia, Microcontroller --- waste your time --- is to give your time to them.

I think Kanshi is just confused - or has not done her due diligence and Micro controller just jumps the band wagon.

Milehigh had my respect that he left - a real troll will not leave  - or just change his name to "Seamus"

My point:
Many of you have replicated the physics - and saw the attributes of the system and that it is Overuntiy

We can not hope that the moderator can keep up with trolling -
So instead of responding to the continual twisting and changing of statements and directions of attacks -

If you must respond to a diversion attack - just make a this statement:

We hear you, we will think about it, and if necessary we will change it.
Thank you for your input.

Lets get off of the tennis court where they control our time with "untruths, false assertions, misuse of logic and dogmatic entropy - and return to the discovery at hand.

In the end - any great leader knows - we are only in control of ourselves - we can not force lasting change in others - it comes from inside each of us to do our part - and not feed the "trolls".

Wayne Travis

The obstructionists know that they are not talking about the topic at hand - that is their point - we are better than that.

[neptune]

@Mondrasec. I can only second what you said about the report from Iflewmyown. Any kind of background information would be welcome and interesting. Living as I do in the UK, I am even further away, and totally unable to come and see for myself.
@Mr Wayne. I hear what you say about not feeding the trolls. Your experiences in Corporate Life are interesting although I can not relate to them directly as I have always worked for myself. Even so, I guess we have all met people like that.
         I would like to think that at least some of the trolls will be silenced when we here what Mark Dansie has to say. Even that might be to much to hope. Any news or updates on the pre tests?